yup
Context from
boredsurgeon
#476441
2025-12-09 20:17
the only place people talk to each other in 3D is in games
and it's a voice chat
so we like to chat in text, it is more information dense, this appears to be true - hard part still remains
fortunately I only spent $500K to learn this same lesson
and just threw it away and went back to 2D
and I feel very comfortable this is a broader issue because Facebook with 2 billion users spent $32 actual billion dollars trying to get them to chat to each other in 3D
we had the 3D interface and the Discord interface in parallel for ~1 year and everyone ended up back in Discord
is that information density of 3D is still too low
from 21-22
i will say another thing that everyone appears to have comprehensively learned
too late at night for this; Bryan Johnson will not approve
Context from
boredsurgeon
#476415
2025-12-09 20:12
sorry i was making an espresso
obviously FFS the important part is not if I am looking at @[maybe] avatar in 2D or 3D who gives a shit about this
we finally have a promising one here I think
no harm in that
so we should feel comfortable exploring different UX
@[teexels] is your guy
Context from
GarryB1rd
#476404
2025-12-09 20:11
tmrw ok.
urgent or tomorrow ok?
Context from
GarryB1rd
#476400
2025-12-09 20:10
how do i take a snap shot of holders of a meme card. sos
not in my filing cabinet
not on AWS
in people's wallet
the tokens would be exactly where they were the whole time
if AWS where this website is hosted was also hit by a meteor tomorrow
if i was hit by a meteor tomorrow
are zero % exposed to me and 'continuity' as such
the investors (mostly me) in the museum, the investors (mostly not me) in the fund, any meme card holder, etc etc
to put it differently
i did not ask anyone to buy a subscription to discord or to oncyber or anywhere else and for the same reason
and that is why boys and girls we learn the lesson that we do not invest money in centralized digital services
and oncyber is effectively no more
he did not take the leap
i thought there was a way it could work
we spent quite a lot of time working on it
rayan had a plan along those lines
whoa font size
you will note that every single place I have touched money:
- NFTs for museum
- NFTs for fund
- NFTs for network
it is only if the underlying is a decentralized token
-
but in the end he did not get there
Rayan thought he could do it (decentralize)
could not figure out how to decentralize it effectively so it never left 'testnet' - never took a penny from anyone bc it was not only centralized, but the demands of graphics meant it was going to stay that way for the foreseeable future
Context from
boredsurgeon
#476364
2025-12-09 20:02
come on, wheres my 3D OM to walk around in
why will that eliminate the risk factors
Context from
maybe
#476362
2025-12-09 20:02
like at the 1155 level? Is that not techncially possible?
even within NFTs there are big differences
what happens when hugo wants to assign it to his collection
what "Cryptopunks"?
Context from
maybe
#476358
2025-12-09 20:01
another stupid question: why can we not just limit it to certain token types at the protocol level?
(this is the hardest part)
and priced on an ongoing basis
so it has to be priced
xTDH creates a small, variable but real cost
does not change the fact that assigning xTDH to 6529 Raw will cost nothing to index and assigning the same amount of xTDH to "every holder of $rekt" will cost many orders of magnitude more to index
Context from
punk6529
#476350
2025-12-09 19:58
and it is a great way to move the discussion forward
using an actual implementation
and it is a great way to move the discussion forward
very explicitly
we launched a testnet
Context from
david
#476345
2025-12-09 19:57
do you think it's a good idea to be so far along with xTDH without having answers to these problems. if we launch a centralized version and then have to take it back?