19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476443 2025-12-09 20:17
yup
Context from boredsurgeon #476441 2025-12-09 20:17
the only place people talk to each other in 3D is in games and it's a voice chat
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476442 2025-12-09 20:17
so we like to chat in text, it is more information dense, this appears to be true - hard part still remains
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476437 2025-12-09 20:16
fortunately I only spent $500K to learn this same lesson
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476435 2025-12-09 20:15
and just threw it away and went back to 2D
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476434 2025-12-09 20:15
and I feel very comfortable this is a broader issue because Facebook with 2 billion users spent $32 actual billion dollars trying to get them to chat to each other in 3D
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476432 2025-12-09 20:14
we had the 3D interface and the Discord interface in parallel for ~1 year and everyone ended up back in Discord
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476429 2025-12-09 20:14
is that information density of 3D is still too low
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476426 2025-12-09 20:13
i will say another thing that everyone appears to have comprehensively learned
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476420 2025-12-09 20:13
too late at night for this; Bryan Johnson will not approve
Context from boredsurgeon #476415 2025-12-09 20:12
sorry i was making an espresso
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476417 2025-12-09 20:13
obviously FFS the important part is not if I am looking at @[maybe] avatar in 2D or 3D who gives a shit about this
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476414 2025-12-09 20:12
we finally have a promising one here I think
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476412 2025-12-09 20:12
so we should feel comfortable exploring different UX
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476407 2025-12-09 20:11
@[teexels] is your guy
Context from GarryB1rd #476404 2025-12-09 20:11
tmrw ok.
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476403 2025-12-09 20:11
urgent or tomorrow ok?
Context from GarryB1rd #476400 2025-12-09 20:10
how do i take a snap shot of holders of a meme card. sos
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476398 2025-12-09 20:10
the tokens would be exactly where they were the whole time
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476396 2025-12-09 20:10
if AWS where this website is hosted was also hit by a meteor tomorrow
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476395 2025-12-09 20:10
if i was hit by a meteor tomorrow
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476394 2025-12-09 20:10
are zero % exposed to me and 'continuity' as such
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476393 2025-12-09 20:09
the investors (mostly me) in the museum, the investors (mostly not me) in the fund, any meme card holder, etc etc
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476389 2025-12-09 20:08
i did not ask anyone to buy a subscription to discord or to oncyber or anywhere else and for the same reason
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476388 2025-12-09 20:07
and that is why boys and girls we learn the lesson that we do not invest money in centralized digital services
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476387 2025-12-09 20:07
and oncyber is effectively no more
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476385 2025-12-09 20:07
i thought there was a way it could work
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476384 2025-12-09 20:07
we spent quite a lot of time working on it
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476383 2025-12-09 20:07
rayan had a plan along those lines
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476380 2025-12-09 20:06
you will note that every single place I have touched money: - NFTs for museum - NFTs for fund - NFTs for network it is only if the underlying is a decentralized token -
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476375 2025-12-09 20:05
but in the end he did not get there
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476374 2025-12-09 20:04
Rayan thought he could do it (decentralize)
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476372 2025-12-09 20:04
could not figure out how to decentralize it effectively so it never left 'testnet' - never took a penny from anyone bc it was not only centralized, but the demands of graphics meant it was going to stay that way for the foreseeable future
Context from boredsurgeon #476364 2025-12-09 20:02
come on, wheres my 3D OM to walk around in
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476365 2025-12-09 20:02
why will that eliminate the risk factors
Context from maybe #476362 2025-12-09 20:02
like at the 1155 level? Is that not techncially possible?
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476361 2025-12-09 20:01
even within NFTs there are big differences
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476360 2025-12-09 20:01
what happens when hugo wants to assign it to his collection
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476359 2025-12-09 20:01
what "Cryptopunks"?
Context from maybe #476358 2025-12-09 20:01
another stupid question: why can we not just limit it to certain token types at the protocol level?
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476354 2025-12-09 20:00
xTDH creates a small, variable but real cost
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476353 2025-12-09 20:00
does not change the fact that assigning xTDH to 6529 Raw will cost nothing to index and assigning the same amount of xTDH to "every holder of $rekt" will cost many orders of magnitude more to index
Context from punk6529 #476350 2025-12-09 19:58
and it is a great way to move the discussion forward
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476350 2025-12-09 19:58
and it is a great way to move the discussion forward
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476348 2025-12-09 19:58
we launched a testnet
Context from david #476345 2025-12-09 19:57
do you think it's a good idea to be so far along with xTDH without having answers to these problems. if we launch a centralized version and then have to take it back?