being social awkward and interrupting an interesting chat
Context from
smperlow
#268527
2025-08-21 13:55
? What did I do?
and does it matter
can we allocate exactly how much work each person put in etc etc
card we all like
the Linus Law
meh
Context from
RegularDad
#268508
2025-08-21 13:51
I think there is a difference between help and made it. Help to me implies to me that he did the work, and had someone to figure out to do or fix some things.
like Schrodinger but in JPGs
the Danguiz Cat
it now also contains
this is now why it is a good piece
Context from
dangiuz
#268495
2025-08-21 13:49
When I take credit for something people say it's not mine. When I don't take credit for something people say it's mine. The Schrodinger's Cat has just reincarnated in Dangiuz Cat.
but why should that make any difference
you would all think it is sweet and cute
if @[VonMises] told us his sister went to RISD and helped him out nights and weekends with it
honestly the only reason anyone is upset is because it is Dan
the "obvious" understanding of what @[VonMises] meant
and the secret one
or a double conceptual piece
it is now a conceptual piece
anyway, the card just got better imho
not off-chain
provenance is on-chain
and you guys are just too uncouth to get it
and said 'I am making a very deep point about provenance here"
I would have leaned into the fact that it was Dan
tbh if it was me
you my friend are developing a real specialty practice in confusing situations with provenance
Context from
dangiuz
#268474
2025-08-21 13:45
inb4 someone submits an Adobe Yearly Subscription License Screenshot titled "Unquestionable Artistic Provenance" as the next meme card 🙏
my ongoing assumption is that VM is a grail Excel artist
honestly, that is on you
that he forgot to mention the last 5 years he was here
was secretly a grail NFT artist
if anyone believed that Von freaking Mises
i dunno brosef
Context from
HugoFaz
#268465
2025-08-21 13:44
the initial issue was with the card not making much sense with the name banner and all, when an NFT doesnt need a visual signature to have unquestionable provenance. then when it surfaces that another artist from the community collaborated but it was purposefully hidden, it makes it even more ironic. i do think it makes a difference and that the card would have been received differently if it was clearly stated, and maybe all this discussion would have surfaced earlier if it had been stated.
to improve the piece
@[6529er] has absolutely given a hand in the curated dates to certain artists
and you don't know this either
from their spouse
from a collegue
from a friend
got help in their art
I have not the slightest idea if any of the 400 artists who submitted to the memes
it is the on-chain part
and to be super clear on how I understand provenance
I would say that I almost understood the opposite
but I never understood that the main point of the card was "that VM was slaving in PS"
I mean, art is subjective etc etc
i never read it that way
no
Context from
RegularDad
#268446
2025-08-21 13:42
Isn't Unquestaionable Provenance supposed to point to who really made the art?
if people thought "whatever they thought" and did not say it, well that is their issue right?
what does it matter if it is Dan or "anyone else"
i mean did anyone think that VM himself did the art?
but I am pretty sure I saw a tweet where VM got help with the art