network should ruthlessly seek out the best value for money for everything
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
nothing else
we can have only one goal; the network wins
i do not think the majority of christian churches over millenia were funded by government tax money
Really a good post. I learn, and got stuck on Christianity example.. There are lot of churches because government funded them with tax money. Why would government fund network state.. hmm..
95% of the proposals should be won by people who have nothing to do with us
and like 1,000 actively engaged here
there are 8B people out there
the likelihood that an existing community member is "the best person from a cost/value perspective" to deliver any specific job is close to nil
but this is horrifically wrong
is that "here is a pool of money and let's find a away, that we, the DAO members can absorb it"
i think the thing that happens to be more precise
for our RFPs
so we generate competitive proposals
I will tweet the sh-t out of the RFPs
all in public
anyway we will run a corporate++++ process
also a feeling that it is other people's money
Alignment is missing. Also the biggest problem in our view is the disengaged whale issue.
Which doesn’t exist here to a large degree.
"absolutely under no circumstances do it that way"
so there is nothing to learn from them except
has been a complete clownshow
generally DAO voting on this type of stuff
step 5: pick from the X approved projects, which want you would be willing to direct your protocol share to
step 4: pick one
step 3 evaluate the bidders
step 2 is "have a RFP period"
step up is "define what you want and if you want it"
and everyone is like "sure"
it is not like you just show up one day and say I want $1M to build a skatepark
this is how real organizations work
not like a proposal process
personally I would run it like a procurement process
like a procurement process
sure it would be a proposal interfeace
yes would be needed
it is a good check on self-dealing
your fees get put back in the pool
but if you don't fund something in x days
you can't be forced to fund
and then anyone can choose to fund or not fund any one of the proposals
proposals have to pass TDH approval
is to split approval and funding
that model to avoid DAO self-dealing
and as discussed in the past
that money has to come out of that inbound revenue
including how we pay everyone working
I want everything to be decentralized
and we move it down over time
like any startup would have
we should start with a high level of reinvestment in the protocol
#1 to #3