19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #181608 2025-07-11 08:12
been sitting on this for a year almost!
Context from hexum #181606 2025-07-11 08:11
So pumped, ser!!!
punk6529 Memes-Chat #181604 2025-07-11 08:11
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mcicMd9bv-SbO2PIrA0ng6hHP3CgykbY0g-79bMXeHE/edit?tab=t.0
punk6529 Memes-Chat #181602 2025-07-11 08:10
for your comments
punk6529 Memes-Chat #181601 2025-07-11 08:10
Proposed approach for Stream
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #181584 2025-07-11 08:02
[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mcicMd9bv-SbO2PIrA0ng6hHP3CgykbY0g-79bMXeHE/edit?usp=sharing](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mcicMd9bv-SbO2PIrA0ng6hHP3CgykbY0g-79bMXeHE/edit?usp=sharing)
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #181583 2025-07-11 08:02
Proposed approach for Stream for comments
punk6529 The Memes - Main Stage #181552 2025-07-11 07:57
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mcicMd9bv-SbO2PIrA0ng6hHP3CgykbY0g-79bMXeHE/edit?usp=sharing
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #179984 2025-07-10 09:16
or maybe the people who voted did buy and the others did not
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #179982 2025-07-10 09:16
fasciating!
Context from hexum #179964 2025-07-10 09:03
for me the most interesting part is how quickly hugo's piece won and how much support it got (a lot) vs how many mints it is getting (not a lot)
punk6529 Memes-Chat #179179 2025-07-09 21:06
After being rugged by twitter, I buckled down and re-wrote it
punk6529 Memes-Chat #179177 2025-07-09 21:06
https://x.com/punk6529/status/1943053602853187609
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #178534 2025-07-09 15:25
i did a whole thread on this!
Context from Memeticx #178532 2025-07-09 15:24
Does everyone know where the term "meme" comes from? If not, I've got you covered! "Meme" was coined in 1976 by biologist Richard Dawkins in his book "The Selfish Gene". Dawkins used it to describe an idea, behavior, or cultural element that spreads from person to person. (currently #19 in the voting)![Seize](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GvXak0NWUAEhEp8?format=jpg&name=medium)
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #178501 2025-07-09 15:00
privacy and scaling
Context from sathar #178493 2025-07-09 14:51
Sounds great!it's for security right?
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178479 2025-07-09 14:46
but they solve multiple problems at the same time
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178478 2025-07-09 14:46
bc they are odd and weird
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178477 2025-07-09 14:46
is building our brains in this direction
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178476 2025-07-09 14:46
and it is the biggest challenge I / we currently have
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178475 2025-07-09 14:46
I am completely convinced that ZKP will play a big role in our (6529's) future
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178469 2025-07-09 14:45
proving cost would be low
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178468 2025-07-09 14:44
our blocks would not be very large at least at first
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178467 2025-07-09 14:44
really, really, really interesting idea
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178464 2025-07-09 14:43
@[simo] @[GelatoGenesis]
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178462 2025-07-09 14:43
This is a very interesting idea
punk6529 Memes-Chat #178461 2025-07-09 14:42
Below is a “long-form translation” of Georgios Konstantopoulos’ tweets into plainer (but still technical) language, plus extra context for how this would work inside Ethereum. ## 1. What “SNARK PoW” actually is Classic designGeorgios’ proposal**Proof-of-Stake (PoS)**: validators lock ETH and *vote* on blocks. The fork-choice rule is *LMD-GHOST*; every block carries thousands of attestation messages.**Proof-of-Work over SNARKs**: the *work* is producing a zero-knowledge proof that the entire block’s transactions are valid. Whoever delivers the first valid proof wins the block. The idea is not to roll back to Bitcoin-style nonce-grinding. Instead, miners (call them **provers**) spend their GPU/ASIC cycles on generating zk-SNARK proofs. Those proofs are *needed* anyway to let the network trust gigabyte-sized blocks without re-executing them. This is a flavour of **“proof-of-useful work”** already researched by Aleo’s **Proof-of-Succinct-Work** and similar systems([Daonft](https://daonft.medium.com/aleos-consensus-mechanism-an-in-depth-look-at-proof-of-succinct-work-posw-659746c38c0c?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Aleo's Consensus Mechanism: An In-Depth Look at Proof of ... - daonft"), [Aleo](https://www.aleo.org/post/proof-of-stake-vs-proof-of-work/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Proof of Stake vs Proof of Work: A guide to consensus mechanisms")). ## 2. Why Georgios claims it beats today’s PoS Tweet bulletWhat it means (with links)**“higher gas limit because no re-execution”**In PoS Ethereum every full node re-executes *all* transactions to be certain the block is valid. If the block instead ships a SNARK, a node only has to verify one constant-size proof (tens of milliseconds). That removes today’s ~30 Mgas ceiling and opens the door to “Gigagas” blocks. ([X](https://x.com/gakonst/status/1942719141992919262?utm_source=chatgpt.com ""SNARK PoW is more efficient than PoS. - higher gas limit bc no re ..."))**“faster blocks – less networking, no voting”**LMD-GHOST relies on every active validator gossipping their latest vote; that traffic is what caps slot time at ~12 s. In PoW there is only the winning header, so blocks can be propagated and accepted much faster. ([eth2book.info](https://eth2book.info/latest/part2/consensus/lmd_ghost/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "2.3.3 LMD Ghost - Upgrading Ethereum - The Eth2 Book"))**“zero amortised wasted energy/work via IVC”**Incrementally-Verifiable Computation (IVC) lets provers *roll* proofs: each block’s proof folds in the previous one. All cycles go to something the chain would need anyway, instead of brute-force hashing. ([veridise.com](https://veridise.com/blog/learn-blockchain/recursive-snarks-and-incrementally-verifiable-computation-ivc/ "Recursive SNARKs and incrementally verifiable computation (IVC) | Smart contract audits from Veridise"))**“thinner, permissionless MEV pipeline”**Because the work winner is whoever proves the whole block first, you don’t need today’s MEV-Boost relays that coordinate builders ↔ proposers. Anyone can build/prove/submit.**“adaptive difficulty / throughput”**Difficulty = “how big a proof must you finish first”. The protocol can raise or lower that in real time to target a block interval even as ZK hardware improves.**“we will get zkEVM ASICs”**Exactly like SHA-256 PoW produced specialised silicon, open competition to prove EVM circuits fastest should lead to purpose-built zkEVM chips, accelerating the entire ZK ecosystem. ([rigsmineria.com](https://www.rigsmineria.com/en/guia-definitiva-aleo-mineros-rentables-2025/?srsltid=AfmBOoogUN43irW-4szm1mIGQi9XKX8PJOijJDFqVcJhWk_FNrhSr6wZ&utm_source=chatgpt.com "The Ultimate Guide to Aleo: The Most Profitable ASIC Miners in 2025")) ## 3. How the consensus layer would look 1. **Fork-choice** *Replace LMD-GHOST*. A block’s weight is the cumulative SNARK-PoW behind it; the heaviest-work chain wins (like Nakamoto consensus). No attestations. 2. **Finality gadget** You can still keep a small PoS committee (Casper-FFG style) to sign checkpoints every N blocks for faster economic finality. The committee could be selected *per block* using randomness derived from the PoW winner, so stake becomes a thin BFT wrapper. ([eth2book.info](https://eth2book.info/latest/part2/consensus/overview/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "2.3.2 Overview - Upgrading Ethereum")) 3. **Rewards & issuance** The protocol pays the prover out of: - newly-minted ETH (like block subsidies today), - priority fees, and - any MEV they can capture inside the block. Georgios’ “out of pocket” tweet underscores that these payouts must be enshrined at protocol level, not handed out via grants. ([X](https://x.com/gakonst/status/1942719141992919262?utm_source=chatgpt.com ""SNARK PoW is more efficient than PoS. - higher gas limit bc no re ...")) ## 4. Is it “going back to PoW” and what about energy? - **Yes** – it re-introduces an external resource (compute) race each block. - **But** the cycles are *useful*: every joule of energy produces a proof the chain needs. Hash-based PoW produces a number you throw away. Comparative studies show that zk-proof generation is far more *joules-per-transaction* efficient than SHA-256 mining, though it is still higher than PoS, where only verification is on-chain([Coincub](https://coincub.com/proof-of-work-proof-of-stake/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake: Key Differences Explained | Coincub")). The bet is that the scalability gain (100-1000× more gas per block) amortises that cost better than current rollup-plus-merge-mined architectures. ## 5. Open challenges CategoryWhy it’s hard**Proof speed vs block time**Today a full EVM-equivalent proof for 30 Mgas takes minutes on big servers. Hitting <5 s block times needs 50-100× faster provers or aggressive recursion/parallelism.**Verification cost**Even succinct proofs cost ~300k gas to verify. At Gigagas scale that’s small, but the precompile still needs to be part of the hard fork.**DoS & worst-case proving**Malicious builders might craft pathological circuits that stall honest provers. The difficulty adjustment must detect and penalise that quickly.**Economic analysis**Issuance must be high enough to pay provers *and* maintain chain security, but not so high it wrecks ETH economics. No live chain has run this experiment yet.**Hardware centralisation**ASIC-based proving farms could recreate mining-pool dynamics unless there is ample competition and open-hardware efforts. ## 6. Why Ethereum is the natural testbed - **Liquidity & user demand** – plenty of fees/MEV to pay provers. - **Mature tooling** – EVM circuits, Plonky2/Halo2/Nova libraries, and a deep bench of protocol engineers. - **Road-map synergy** – after *EIP-4844* and *Verkle trees*, the next bottleneck is execution-layer throughput. A SNARK-PoW fork-choice directly addresses that without new L2s. ### Bottom line Georgios is advocating a *radical simplification*: > “Turn the *entirety* of block production into one race – first to prove a huge EVM block wins. Let stake handle only checkpoint finality. Everything else (throughput, MEV, hardware R&D) will self-optimise around that single, paid PoW function.” It’s ambitious, unproven, and energy-heavier than PoS-only Ethereum, but if the technical hurdles fall, it could unlock block sizes and confirmation times that today’s rollup-centric roadmap can’t reach. **Further reading** - Veridise blog – *Recursive SNARKs & IVC*([veridise.com](https://veridise.com/blog/learn-blockchain/recursive-snarks-and-incrementally-verifiable-computation-ivc/ "Recursive SNARKs and incrementally verifiable computation (IVC) | Smart contract audits from Veridise")) - Aleo – *Proof-of-Succinct-Work* white-papers and miners’ guides([Daonft](https://daonft.medium.com/aleos-consensus-mechanism-an-in-depth-look-at-proof-of-succinct-work-posw-659746c38c0c?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Aleo's Consensus Mechanism: An In-Depth Look at Proof of ... - daonft"), [rigsmineria.com](https://www.rigsmineria.com/en/guia-definitiva-aleo-mineros-rentables-2025/?srsltid=AfmBOoogUN43irW-4szm1mIGQi9XKX8PJOijJDFqVcJhWk_FNrhSr6wZ&utm_source=chatgpt.com "The Ultimate Guide to Aleo: The Most Profitable ASIC Miners in 2025")) - Eth2Book – detailed explanation of LMD-GHOST and Casper FFG([eth2book.info](https://eth2book.info/latest/part2/consensus/lmd_ghost/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "2.3.3 LMD Ghost - Upgrading Ethereum - The Eth2 Book"), [eth2book.info](https://eth2book.info/latest/part2/consensus/overview/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "2.3.2 Overview - Upgrading Ethereum"))
punk6529 Network Use Cases Reply #173792 2025-07-06 07:52
figuring out the right use for rep vs TDH is a good project
Context from Zar #173787 2025-07-06 07:40
So they don't have TDH but are granted Rep, What can that Rep be used for though..?? Thought leaders Rep > 1 : An engagement with 6529 every Friday to discuss NFTs at Brain..
punk6529 Memes-Chat #166086 2025-06-29 23:12
back to the mines for me!
punk6529 Memes-Chat #166085 2025-06-29 23:12
and I am very much not!
punk6529 Memes-Chat #166084 2025-06-29 23:12
I was supposed to be finished with this type of thing in my 20s
punk6529 Memes-Chat #166083 2025-06-29 23:11
less happy to report that I have to get up in 3 hours for a flight and I am still awake and not done with a presentation I have been working on all weekend
punk6529 Memes-Chat #166082 2025-06-29 23:11
happy to report that I am not a moron this time and remembered to subscribe my family members to SZN12
punk6529 The Memes - Main Stage Reply #165108 2025-06-26 23:16
!!!
Context from golden618 #165101 2025-06-26 22:48
Mind you, Ser - you haven't voted for @[ack] card yet. If you put your TDH thumb on the scale, it will break 100m right now.
punk6529 Memes-Chat #165107 2025-06-26 23:15
it is a nice place to chat about pepes
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165106 2025-06-26 23:15
hope so!
Context from purchardus #165104 2025-06-26 23:01
Hopefully @[VincentVanDough] likes it here and wants to migrate some notable Pepes over.
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165096 2025-06-26 22:39
they are great but not as active i think
Context from Memeticx #165091 2025-06-26 22:36
Well it's certainly moving up quickly in my book. RarePepe and FakeRares were in first but have lost a bit of steam.
punk6529 Memes-Chat #165090 2025-06-26 22:34
we need to find the language to expand it
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165089 2025-06-26 22:34
it is the best group in crypto
Context from Memeticx #165084 2025-06-26 22:32
I'm somewhat new and find myself checking-in every day now. It certainly is a more insightful spot!
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #165087 2025-06-26 22:33
type: meant to say "her"
Context from punk6529 #165083 2025-06-26 22:32
i hope so. i think about here now or then and wonder what happened
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165085 2025-06-26 22:32
ah no typos i think - thanks for flagging - we were previously going to start then - @[prxt0] pls take a look
Context from jyppy #165082 2025-06-26 22:31
2 things recently caught my attention on Memes Calendar.....Next 6/30? significance> ? and dates and days seem one day off...e.g. 6/30 Tuesday
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #165083 2025-06-26 22:32
i hope so. i think about here now or then and wonder what happened
Context from maybe #165040 2025-06-26 22:00
Do you guys think memu found a new fight club?
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165081 2025-06-26 22:31
in person events will always matter to people ofc
Context from GulYildiz #165075 2025-06-26 22:22
I can say for myself, I like to make organic connections. That's why I've attended some nft events. Some people may not like that. In general, while I'm grateful for the friendships I've made on web3, I have to say that we live in an age of accelerated socialization (as Hartmut Rosa puts it), everything moves very fast. An age in which everything is produced and consumed very quickly
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165080 2025-06-26 22:30
indeed - was deep in a major breakthrough needed project, i broke through and now as noted above have had to remember how to come in here and just type things
Context from jyppy #165078 2025-06-26 22:27
long time no see/talk/chat ser 6529
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165079 2025-06-26 22:30
the magic will be to get them to come talk about grifters here, not about memes per se
Context from david #165072 2025-06-26 22:21
I think many communities are entrenched and tribal and will be possible but not a guarantee to migrate them all to come here
punk6529 Memes-Chat #165067 2025-06-26 22:12
most pro-social place in the crypto space
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #165066 2025-06-26 22:12
yes agreed
Context from purchardus #165064 2025-06-26 22:11
ok. I think we are making a pro-social environment here
punk6529 The Memes - Main Stage #165065 2025-06-26 22:12
look at that @[ack] in first place - who would have ever guessed 😀
punk6529 Memes-Chat #165063 2025-06-26 22:09
the better it runs