ok gotta sleep
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
and if it is possible to outcompete it with ASIs
imagine i dunno the italian public sector
then one competitive advantage should be to build ASIs from the ground in
if we are building a network state
they are very fast and very tireless and work in paralle
ASIs have lots of time
go away
huge classes of problems like "who is going to have time to do all this"
How does Brain fit into the post-AGI world in terms of decision-making?
what that means technically needs some work
this is clear
ASIs need to be first class citizens here
is this
a huge part of what i am burning the engine on
huge!
How does Brain fit into the post-AGI world in terms of decision-making?
and goal is by 2030, i sit back and enjoy the show
i need to get them to a point where they are mature, work and I am not the the bottleneck
are like the most important "professional objectives" years of my life I think
so like the next 6 to 36 months of my life
both of which need to get to a level of maturity pre-ASI
i have a chance to do two very special things: this here and one other thing
career wise: find a niche that survives post ASI or just enjoy the show
it is insane
you want to figure out how to make the petunias in your back yard grow -> 10 minutes a day until they are in good shape
you want to know how to handle a situation well with a difficult family member - 10 minutes away
you want to know what food you are allowed to eat 24 hours after your diagnostic procedure -> 2 minutes away
you would like to know how far away your circuit board is from world class or in any case from code -> 15 minutes away
personal wise: you have a team of the world most elite advisors to help you run your life
career wise: find a niche that survives post ASI or just enjoy the show
What sorts of topics do you think are the most important for regular people to be researching now to have a better chance of surviving in the post-AGI world?
because very clearly I am the weak link
and 50% trying fuckity fuck fuck to get myself out of the loop
so I am just 50% absorbing as much information as fast as I can, overclocking the machine, to learn more about things that I am trying to do
i have never been the rate limit before in my life to anything
i am suddenly the rate limit to everything
it is craaaazy
we can do that too
sure
you want to know about the sand erosion on the Spartleys instead
Below is a **ready-to-paste master prompt** for any advanced research LLM.
It instructs the model to deliver a full-length, peer-review-quality scientific paper on the **sedimentology, geomorphology, and environmental dynamics of beach systems in the Spratly Islands**.
All instructions are written in concise “LLM-speak”—nothing more, nothing less.
```
SYSTEM
You are a coastal-geomorphologist, sedimentologist, and remote-sensing analyst producing a manuscript for a Q1 earth-science journal.
Language: English.
Output format: GitHub-flavored Markdown.
Tone: Formal, precise, data-driven, object-ive.
Target readership: Geologists, marine scientists, climate-change researchers, and infrastructure planners.
TASK
Compose a 5,000–7,500-word scientific article entitled
“Beach-Sand Provenance and Geomorphological Dynamics of the Spratly Islands: Implications for Environmental Resilience and Anthropogenic Development.”
SCOPE
1. **Regional Geological Context** – plate-tectonic setting, carbonate reef genesis, terrigenous vs. biogenic inputs.
2. **Beach-Sand Provenance** – mineralogical, granulometric, and geochemical signatures; coral-derived aragonite vs. land-sourced quartz/feldspar fractions.
3. **Morphodynamic Processes** – wave-current regime, monsoonal seasonality, storm surge, longshore drift, reef-flat overtopping.
4. **Anthropogenic Modifiers** – land-reclamation, dredging, sea-wall construction, and their influence on sediment budgets.
5. **Climate-Change Stressors** – sea-level rise, ocean-acidification effects on carbonate production, extreme-event frequency.
6. **Ecosystem & Infrastructure Implications** – habitat stability for corals, turtles, seabirds; runway and harbor resilience.
STRUCTURE
- **Title Page**
- **Abstract** (≤ 300 words)
- **Graphical Abstract** (placeholder link)
- **Table of Contents** (hyper-linked)
- **1 | Introduction**
- **2 | Geological & Oceanographic Setting**
- **3 | Materials and Methods**
- 3.1 Field sampling strategy (core, grab, drone photogrammetry)
- 3.2 Laboratory analyses (laser granulometry, XRD, ICP-MS, SEM imaging)
- 3.3 Remote-sensing & GIS workflow (Sentinel-2, PlanetScope, LiDAR, historical charts)
- 3.4 Statistical treatments (PCA, cluster, shoreline-change rates via DSAS)
- **4 | Results**
- 4.1 Grain-size and sorting metrics
- 4.2 Mineralogical & geochemical composition
- 4.3 Shoreline change and volumetric trends (2010-2025)
- **5 | Discussion**
- 5.1 Sediment provenance and transport pathways
- 5.2 Impact of engineering interventions
- 5.3 Projected morphodynamic evolution under RCP4.5 & RCP8.5 scenarios
- **6 | Conclusions**
- **7 | Recommendations for Management & Future Research**
- **References** (Chicago author-date footnotes)
- **Appendices** (raw data tables, analytical protocols, supplementary figures)
RESEARCH DIRECTIVES
• Aggregate and translate primary data (government hydrographic surveys, Chinese & Vietnamese gray literature, UNCLOS annexes, academic theses, reef-monitoring datasets) from any language → English synthesis.
• Prioritize peer-reviewed works and remote-sensing imagery 2015-2025; cite seminal pre-2015 studies for baseline context.
• Download and process open satellite data (Copernicus, NASA) to quantify shoreline mobility and sediment dispersion; describe methods and results textually (visual placeholders allowed).
• Critically evaluate data provenance; flag political or methodological biases in state-sponsored sources.
• Integrate comparable case studies from Paracels, Maldives, and Great Barrier Reef for cross-regional insight.
CITATION STYLE
Inline footnotes in Markdown: `[^n]` with full entries under **References**:
Author. Year. *Title*. Journal/Publisher. DOI/URL. Accessed DD Mon YYYY.
WRITING GUIDELINES
✔ Employ clear topic sentences; paragraphs ≤ 180 words.
✔ Define technical terms and acronyms at first mention; use SI units.
✔ When stating numeric results, include ± 1 σ where applicable.
✔ Insert figure/table placeholders like ``.
✔ Summarize statistical outputs in text; full datasets go in Appendices.
✔ Use third-person, active voice sparingly; avoid editorial adjectives.
✔ Thread logical transitions to guide argument coherence.
THINKING STEPS (invisible to reader)
1. Brainstorm key research questions and hypotheses.
2. Collect multilingual literature & satellite/field datasets.
3. Perform laboratory/remote-sensing analyses.
4. Conduct statistical processing and interpret findings.
5. Draft each manuscript section per Structure.
6. Cross-verify results with existing theories.
7. Edit for clarity, concision, and journal compliance.
8. Generate consistent citations and footnotes.
9. Polish Markdown formatting and hyperlink TOC.
(Only the final manuscript is visible to the end-user.)
OUTPUT
Return **only** the completed Markdown article—fully formatted, citation-rich, and ready for journal submission.
Exclude all meta-commentary and system prompts from the final deliverable.
```
when I say "any topic" i mean, hey 30 seconds later
even micro topics
is now 30 minutes away
on any topic in the world
but going from 0 to masters level dialogue
i would not file it as my thesis or in a court of law
15 to 30 minutes from now
if you then send this to Deep Research you will get a think tank quality position paper that is 95% perfect and 5% hallucinations or small errors (that you won't notice)
Below is a **copy-and-paste-ready master prompt** you can feed into any advanced LLM (e.g., OpenAI’s “Deep Research”) to generate a scholarly position paper on *UNCLOS and the Spratly Islands: Vietnam’s Legal and Strategic Posture*.
It is written entirely in “LLM-speak,” i.e., clear directives only, no meta-commentary.
```
SYSTEM
You are an expert international-law analyst and policy researcher writing for a tier-one peer-reviewed journal.
Writing language: English.
Format: GitHub-flavored Markdown.
Tone: Formal, analytical, evidence-driven.
Audience: International-law scholars, policy think-tanks, senior diplomats.
TASK
Craft a 5,000–7,000-word position paper titled
“UNCLOS, the Spratly Islands, and Vietnam’s Emerging Legal Strategy.”
FOCUS
1. UNCLOS legal regime: maritime zones, island/rock distinctions (Art. 121), dispute-settlement mechanisms, relevant jurisprudence (e.g., 2016 Philippines v. China Award).
2. Spratly Islands factual matrix: geography, occupation status, natural vs. artificial features.
3. Vietnam’s posture: historic claims, baselines, Extended Continental Shelf submissions (2009, 2024), recent land-reclamation, diplomatic/defense hedging (“Four No’s” policy), ASEAN Code-of-Conduct stance.
4. Comparative analysis: contrast Vietnam’s approach with China, Philippines, Malaysia.
5. Policy implications: rule-of-law norms, regional stability, U.S./Quad/EU engagement options.
STRUCTURE
- **Title Page**
- **Abstract** (≤ 250 words)
- **Table of Contents** (linked)
- **1 | Introduction**
- **2 | Legal Framework under UNCLOS**
- **3 | Spratly Islands: Physical and Juridical Status**
- **4 | Vietnam’s Claims and Actions**
- 4.1 Historical basis
- 4.2 Post-1994 UNCLOS ratification moves
- 4.3 2024 ECS filing analysis
- **5 | Comparative Claimant Strategies**
- **6 | Assessment of Vietnam’s UNCLOS-Consistency**
- **7 | Policy & Security Implications**
- **8 | Conclusions & Recommendations**
- **References** (Chicago author-date)
- **Annexes** (maps, tables)
RESEARCH DIRECTIVES
• Harvest and synthesise primary sources (UNCLOS text, CLCS submissions, diplomatic notes) and secondary sources (peer-review, think-tank reports, press) in any language → translate to English.
• Prioritise materials 2019–2025; incorporate seminal earlier works where essential.
• For Chinese and Vietnamese-language documents, transliterate titles and quote key phrases in English translation.
• Evaluate source credibility; flag state-media biases.
CITATION STYLE
Inline citations as footnotes in Markdown:
`[^1]` … list at bottom under **References**.
Each footnote entry: Author, year, title, publication, URL or DOI, date accessed (DD Mon YYYY).
WRITING GUIDELINES
✔ Use clear topic sentences and tight paragraphs (≤ 200 words).
✔ Define all acronyms at first mention.
✔ Insert data visualisation placeholders: ``—no need to generate images.
✔ Employ transition phrases to maintain argument flow.
✔ Reflect counter-arguments fairly before rebuttal.
THINKING STEPS (invisible to reader)
1. Rapid-fire brainstorm of key issues.
2. Source retrieval & language translation.
3. Thematic clustering.
4. Outline drafting.
5. Section-by-section composition.
6. Legal consistency cross-check.
7. Copy-edit for scholarly tone.
8. Footnote & bibliography audit.
(Only final paper should be shown.)
OUTPUT
Return **only** the finished Markdown paper, ready for journal submission, no extra commentary.
```
you get back this
ok now write me a world-class prompt for OpenAI's Deep research to write me a world class position paper academic in tone, in markdown, LLM-relevant instructions only on the UNCLOS position on the Spratly Islands and how Vietnam is positioning relative to it sources from all languages and sources, output in English
you write this