explain
Context from
maybe
#114903
2025-05-13 21:58
can you make a friday afternoon ama with my wife?
let me process this. thanks for the idea!
Context from
Sert
#114902
2025-05-13 21:46
Check out this proposal when you get a chance @[punk6529]
https://6529.io/my-stream?wave=19cd9d28-9837-4426-aa37-aa7ab6ea56de&serialNo=113893
and now everyone is also happier about it
and it is what like 10 days later?
@[MintFace] was obviously going to get his card
so much totally unnecessary anxiety!
when I tell you all not to worry about something, well, I think you should not worry about it
looks like @[MintFace] is in the home stretch
we will figure out how to enable this elsehwere
not on the memes
@[teexels] do you have a tweetable version of today's card?
thank you for chasing us down on this
Context from
MOJ
#112823
2025-05-12 18:36
The standings are not presented properly.
1ST, 2ND, 3RD are correct.
But when you get to 21, 22, 23 on the leaderboard, instead of following the same st/nd/rd rule, we have TH.
21st, 31st, 41st…
22nd, 33nd, 42nd…
23rd, 33rd, 43rd..
Not 21TH, 22TH, 23TH
Th is for the rest of the numbers, not 1,2, or 3.
we will take care of lol @[simo]
Context from
GelatoGenesis
#112864
2025-05-12 18:50
Oh. This is @[simo]s thing
ZK Proofs are wild
don't leverage trade, etc, etc
that is a nice ringer collection
shame
otherwise this makes no sense
for a trade
one must suspect these were collateral
https://x.com/Gfunkera86/status/1922011048074235966
correct - but in the meantime the UI is improving rapidly - it is OK to be testing / iterating with a smaller more committed group
Context from
Zigmarillion
#111504
2025-05-10 21:35
Much is left to be revealed and when it is that will set the stage for how the dynamics that influence the platform works and then people really will test its limits and how things will work in practice will evolve
double fisting cold espressos to start off the day
gmeme!
no did not see but this is what we need to think about
Context from
maybe
#110513
2025-05-09 23:14
not Sure if you saw earlier I was trying to pull it away from NFTs to think about the future
either
not some other TDH you are imaging, the actual TDH on the Network page
the answer to that seems important
"what would you entrust to TDH"
i think a useful question to sleep on
1 good xcopy edition
Context from
maybe
#110496
2025-05-09 23:08
Probably be like $1-1.5 m, so I agree with you
so it is still fairly inexpensive to get to my run-rate in the scheme of things
so DGMD is now accruing +41,236 TDH per day (2/3rds of punk6529)
but that is obviously ridiculous
by our logic, BTC should be a big failure
is my point
i just think the group is very hard on itself sometimes
Context from
fatesensation
#110484
2025-05-09 23:02
What is the Overton Window for meme cards necessary to keep Team 6529 on message for 15 years?
glad to hear that i have infinite liquidity
Context from
MoMO
#110481
2025-05-09 23:01
Yes, it isn’t a direct hedge, but is a buffer and balancer. provides better cushion, and in a non-linear manner when prices increase. So more destroyed hence more share. And if prices drop, there’s less demand for more cards, so the natural absorber of excess supply is him again. So more cards and more TDH share.
and it is obviously vastly more centralized than TDH
and now up to the level of nation-states
that it is in fact sufficiently decentralized
because team BTC has managed to stay on message for 15 years
it is useful to understand
by extrapolating this group's logic, this is basically a centralized non-viable protocol. I assume that is why it is worth $0.
let me introduce you to a cryptocurrency known as "Bitcoin" that, like TDH, can be subjected to a 51% attack.
Let's check in on how centralized it is and if someone has more than 2.5% of voting power

1/ obviously i have done nothing malicious
2/ but also all of this whining that you can't be bothered to find 2.5% of the vote IF I (or anyone else) did something malicious is unbecoming
sorry, there are two separate issues here
ok sure
Context from
maybe
#110462
2025-05-09 22:51
if I was single and not watching a baby in a precarious spot I’d try to research who was where
yes, I am trying to "centralize power" but spending an infinite amount of time trying to decentralize it
Context from
wuming
#110458
2025-05-09 22:49
I think intentions matter, we can argue he (and others) could right now use his TDH in a malicious or aggressive way to centralize power "unfairly"... is he though? and are others doing it?
i dunno what to tell you