if all of you are going to turn into immediate crybabies at a 2.5% attack
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
and some attacker gathers 2.5% of TDH and attacks
and my validator goes offline
imagine i decide in 2026 to go on vacation
sorry this is loser talk
"Area politician gathers 2.5% of the vote. all others immediately surrender to this overwhelming show of force"
trying again
sorry math errors
This is a legitimately good defense but as a test we should try it
it is not my fault if everyone wants to be lazy
Challenge everyone to over come it
nonsense
The fact remains it’s not overcomeable in practice
"Community members demand punk6529 sells his cards"
You’re not accounting for destroyed TDH. He never sells. So all market activity helps maintain the share.
good analogy
How it is working now is more like the voting before the 24h is the primaries. It puts up the candidates that most are likely to put most of their votes towards
if someone says "who are you going to vote for in November" and I say "Biden" but later I actually vote RFK in the poll booth, do I have any obligation to Biden because before I said Biden? I think not
you can take away your vote at any time before 24 hours and have no consequences on the final vote. once you get into the 24 hour period, there are consequences to your vote even if you change it later.
so I dunno, isn't the pre-24 hour period more like "polling" rather than a "vote"
you can take away your vote at any time before 24 hours and have no consequences on the final vote. once you get into the 24 hour period, there are consequences to your vote even if you change it later.
so I dunno, isn't the pre-24 hour period more like "polling" rather than a "vote"
One question on clarification of the term "Pre-voting" what do you mean by that? And when does "Voting" occur?
nobody thinks i voted down a good card or voted up a bad card that did not have full community support
that is it
you are upset that the pre-voting order changed
this is not the issue
Technically we can all compete with you but practically I don’t see it
push #3 to #1 on cards that you just said everyone agreed with is "a hammer"?
I can probably find but I think you said you were gonna try not to be a hammer
I am old enough to remember 3 weeks ago when "OMG what horrible things did punk mean by NOT VOTING for Chris"
there is incredible selective memory around here
i said i would mostly not vote?
Punk shoulda just said from the beginning ‘I will vote as i wish’ instead of saying he will mostly not vote unless there is a big issue and then backtracking on that while also pretending he didn’t backtrack
this is like "my steak is not shaped like a cow so it is not a cow"
it was obviously happening
everyone knew that there were artists in queue
right but this is just childish right?
no one knew
so, so far, this is an obvious negative of the decentralized process but I do not know if it inevitable or can be just culturally adjusted
for the 23rd week running
exactly nobody ever complained that we used our (100% power) to defer artist X once again
and so long as you guys did not see the sausage being made in the sausage factory
obviously we had the benefit of our deliberations being private
we just picked 3
exactly none of this ever happened when @[6529er] and I looked at the pipeline of cards for the week
like for me this is one of the interesting learnings so far
there is no mixed message from me on this: my view is that we should not make "so and so has been in queue for 5 days so how can you be such a jerk and not let them their turn" into a thing
There are artists who waited for years to get into the memes
but I disagree with that
personally I think there is a cultural thing evolving that "each card gets in a queue and then it is disrespectful to the artists if we move their queue"
obviously "the community" liked all three cards
this seems to really bother people
why is it a big deal that a card that was in fake 3rd place (prevoting) changed order with one that was in fake 1st place?
you guys are doing fine
It would make sense also that youd want to see what we did if left to our own devices
why was nobody spending days coming up with theories about what I should do when I was not voting?
Question: why not just vote full weight every vote?
time to be even more confused
what are you confused about
correct
TDH is also going to provide the base for securing the chain. If it’s an L1
you don't say...
Yeah sure, maybe we should all just chill out
what are you confused about
This is a good question. I think everyone is confused, from collectors to artists
we looped with artists in chat
yeah this is an issue
I think artists should also not view their submission as the final submission ever
If the voting is saying otherwise, an artist should feel free to submit another work or iterate over the current
but at least n=1 person might buy it as a 1/1
plenty of art that may not make it to memes