sometimes i would be lobbying @[6529er] hard for or against something or vice-versa
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
was like this in SZN1-10 too
helping curate the next card
but want to be very clear that people should not read my votes as expressions of anything other than
feeling my way through it
something like that
so i said "ok, this might be interesting to have it with no help from me" particularly since it has a peoples' choice aspect too
@[Articulate] shot up instantly the first day he posted with no help from me, it was clear it was going to get minted sometime in the near future
once it had lots of votes and 70M TDH, it was clear it had support for monday but also maybe people were not doing the 24HR math right so i pushed it over the edge and we changed the calculation so it would be more clear
DF came and posted late - when first posted i gave it 3M TDH to get it visible and then waited for 19 hours to see what people wanted to do
so people could take a look
piece was good and was maybe being overlooked so we boosted it enough to get looked at but not enough to get over the line
also have a bit of a meta-thing going on that I do not want the absolute value of my vote to mean anything.
it is not the case that if I vote X or Y or 10X or 100Y it reflects anything.
I am trying to make sure the collection is: a) great, b) broadly in the direction the group wants
so to take some examples. both @[6529er] and I thought @[Gingerpotter]
Yeah, that’s what I thought, but you know complainooorrs :cope:
you more or less figured it out in your tweet
Great! Ty! :sgt:
until we can think about it
so safety-first we did not enable this
we have not had enough brain cycles to think about this carefully enough
so someone could drop something malicious, people click on it and get infected regardless of it gets voted
here there is no pre--check
we looked at them ourselves, at the html before minting them
the html cards previously minted
you don't want someone to put something into the artwork that will hack your computers and steal your jpgs
i seems to be the only one not getting this lol sry! what does it mean? "arbitrary code" ?
peoples' choice! was clearly going to make it so wanted to see that happen (without me)
@[punk6529] there has been lots of speculation on why you didn’t have any votes for @[Articulate] card. I’m sure you have reasons. can you tell us what they were?
polarizing! personally i had told him that I thought the sky could maybe use texture but anyway he has the bg to make his artist choice
No rational human thinks that blue is ok
it should be where the submission is
than "go find another random wave somewhere"
but I think this is much more likely to work
yes we can make it somehow more obvious
you mean the "discussion channel" ? this means that you would have to drop it here before, and change it if it doesn't get enough traction or if you think it should be improved anyway. makes sense.
talking about this, it's a bit hard to go to "your art's discussion" from the main stage, just a UX improvement, there's space next to FAQ for "my discussion" ... next step could be "discussion I'm following" but that's secondary as they'll show in the main thread anyway
for arbitrary code
need to think carefully about how to make sure we don't create a mechanism
not imminent
for them to be displayed here
will be. but we need to do some things to make it safe
Have one more question - are HTML based NFTs allowed?
yes though I think it will be hard to accomplish in practice
been reading the thread - to clarify. Can an artist have more than 1 card in a season?
ofc it worked! here is the initial concept - it is instantly recognizable even like this
just teasing, actually to this day, everyone knows which card is fvckrender one, so i get his idea worked
the side channel
i think in the replies to the artwork is the only thing that would work
i think in the replies to the artwork is the only thing that would work
i highlithed this point in the initial google Doc, before the SNZ11, to rephrase it and actualize it to nowadays: what's the best place to "discuss the work" i feel like this gc runs super fast, maybe a dedicated shared wave? Each of us, some, well i do, have a personal wave where they share stuffs, but how about a generic one specifically for this purpose? maybe with a similar TDH (and in this case REP) vote on the "proposed works" ? this could also help new artists get the 50k while maintaining the structure organized like this gc with drops and individual "discussions" on each piece
but his concept otherwise came fully formed from the oven
:)
well, it originally had a "gm" on it
we all want to know did fvckrender did? :sgt_sweat_smile:
in both categories there was work that was great and work that we were like 'well, not sure this is going to fit'
some did not
some did
we heavily encouraged artists to do this with us in szn1-szn10
I spent about 50 hours on my card, then shared toward end to get feedback from some meme collectors, and needed to start over based on their feedback. I think it is really important to get feedback along the way.
3 at a time, not 3 per season. the 2 left is a bug @[simo]
so it's 3 at a time! not 3 per season; we had this conversation earlier in this gc with @[arsonic], he still see "2 left" even after the drop
pretty sure anyone else should feel fine to do so also
so if @[6529er] runs drafts by someone for feedback
and even though I said what I said above on @[6529er] and @[arsonic], this is not actually accurate because both of them have always shared their work with me beforehand for feedback
leave it for a while and see if it gets traction
and then drop it