potentially revise
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
discuss the work
show the work
but anyone else
which can be @[6529er] in the reserve case
is to find someone trusted
*
e.g. @[6529er] or @[arsonic] do not need this advice
the tactical strategy for the artist unless you are sure you have the finger on the pulse of the community
agree 100%
For artists, submitting multiple cards at the same time is a bad strategy. It dilutes people's attention (and may piss people off due to spamming). The better strategy is to put the best foot forward and show the more meme-able card. And following up another card only after a blast as large as Arsonic's.
nice to see you too!
@[punk6529] hi there! good to see you here
;)
well yeah! we have the best 2022+ art collection in literally the whole global NFT space. it is literally a 1 in a million type outcome, it is loved, respected, well-curated, etc and then I say "ok, time to hand it over to the anons and hope they don't fuck it up"
i hadn't considered this from the "this is my baby" perspective
congratulations @[Articulate]
very very hard in fact
is not that easy
having a method they could let go to
and even if they were
not many people would be willing to let go
which should not be underestimated
I trusted it with The Memes
but to your substantive point: In TDH We Trust
you should know better than to listen to that guy
Ok thanks for clarifying; thats what I thought initially however Arsonic was thinking it was 3 in total
rekt!!!!
Saved this for posterity. Hopefully the howling success right out of the gate for SZN11 changed your mind.
otherwise some moron is going to get 50K memes nominee rep and bot us with 690 submissions
the 3 at a time is simply antispam
Rather than needing long term limits (but there are 3 simulations submissions limits which I assume is anti spam ) but the discussion above was is that 3 a long term total meme limit and I was arguing I hope not
so yes to answer your question TDH has to sort it all out
TDH will be called upon to make harder decisions than these in the future
the test is of TDH
the test is not what we can do with limits
i deliberately took off all limits
Agree also ; so are the limits necessary is the question of can you trust TDH decision making to enforce its own limits. If the next meme da Vinci turns up should the TDH be able to regulate their submissions or some long term limits lock them out after 3 cards
sorry brosef
DAMNIT
we are not going to vote for 100 @[arsonic] cards in a row (even if he submitted 100 cards in a row which he wouldn't anyway)
and i have pretty close to 100% confidence
it is clear that the collection would not be as good if we did 100 cards in a row from @[arsonic] or something
not for some complex game theory of incentives
primarily because they want them to be good
yes, though I have an even 'stronger' version of this statement. i think people will curate the memes correctly through a sense of professionalism
All I am saying this is anti fragile and they wont vote for extractive behaviour as it will cost them more to do so in damage to the cards held for the TDH
we are on the right track
like i want pizza tonight and you want steak
it is normal
is not a system failure
things like 10 out of the 100 people would have preferred a different card today
by this metric we are scoring 100/100 so far
that will make good decisions in aggregate, on the whole, and over time
the theory was/is that TDH is generally distributed into intelligent and well-meaning hands
but overall very very close to what I think we would have done
maybe a bit more pushing on a couple of designs
maybe a bit of ordering difference
i don't think @[6529er] and I would have been much different