"wen Beeple"
"gets Beeple to do a card per quarter"
"why are you extracing me with Beeple"
Context from
maybe
#67130
2025-04-08 18:11
Ser I could see how it would look this way. I am legit worried. Will be the first to admit when I’m wrong
and i would never consider trying to protect myself from "knowing things"
by being blind to who the artist is
that 6529er and i did not curate well
for the extremely obvious reason
i do not agree with blind voting
this is complaining for the sake of complaining
oh come on
Context from
maybe
#67096
2025-04-08 18:07
1) certain few artists get 80% of exposure accolades and eth 2) mintoors receive valuable cards. this is all fine, of course. Their cards might actually just always be better, explaining their place in the hierarchy. it would be more fun if the artist was blind in my opinion so we’re actually voting in the card. I realize I’m alone on Maybe Island here
i think so and if something goes wrong she can delete it is ok
Context from
arsonic
#67077
2025-04-08 18:02
so she can proceed with her submit?
i don't view this as competitive
why is 'compete' even a relevant concept. it was clearly the most topical card in a way that none of the others are. that card benefits from being selected today. the rest don't
Context from
Dave
#67087
2025-04-08 18:05
Amazing meme artist capturing a moment in time. Hard to not love that. Also hard for others to compete with that.
since you are offering
and outcome as well
please show
what are the incentives
Context from
maybe
#67073
2025-04-08 18:01
1) I could be totally wrong 2) time will tell and it’s very early 3) show me the incentives I’ll show you the outcome
it should not make any difference. I think chrome/brave (Brave is a chromium browser) is complaining that it does not know how to render it but it is all going to th backend anyway
Context from
arsonic
#67048
2025-04-08 17:44
@[simo] any idea on this?
Current/24HR TDH fixed
9er and I would have made at any other point in The Memes
reshuffling is exactly the type of decision
in a way the other ones were not
the DF card was relevant in time
Context from
punk6529
#67062
2025-04-08 17:57
this is an imaginary problem we don't have (famous artists dropping constantly) and in the event we had that problem, it is within our power to control it
this is an imaginary problem we don't have (famous artists dropping constantly) and in the event we had that problem, it is within our power to control it
weird take
Context from
maybe
#66961
2025-04-08 15:57
What I envision is like 5-10 artists who are famous enough basically just rinsing and repeating victories
incredible stuff!
Context from
david
#67019
2025-04-08 16:53
ETH is below 1500 again. Drinks on the BTC holders today
it is in WINNERS!
Context from
longexposure
#65632
2025-04-07 12:32
and after a submission have won and it´s no more in the leaderboard??
no, you get the slot "back"
Context from
agnimax
#65576
2025-04-07 11:27
Happy 😍
also: gifs
https://media.tenor.com/AnPSj_h0PgoAAAAC/dancing-cat-dance.gif
hard refresh on web and the right panel in waves will be much more compact and useful
and hopefully we stop at that point
@[simo] @[GelatoGenesis]
Projected | Current | 24HR
I think we need all 3
we are learning a lot
it is super interesting!
so I agree
and then it changes
it is the same as 24HR at all points until the last 24 hours lol
Context from
chrisroc
#65535
2025-04-07 10:39
this should be the leading metric imho
I just think we need one more metric on the metrics: "Projected At Next Vote"
Context from
Articulate
#65517
2025-04-07 10:35
I think people want to know how their vote will influence the outcome
So we need to show what *will* happen if they vote
too
but I can see the opposite
and 24 hours how many they have weighted over the last 24 hours
I think current vote should be how many votes they have currently
i think our naming is backwards btw
yes for sure
Context from
chrisroc
#65493
2025-04-07 10:31
can someone check my simple math re todays winner:
- DF at around 30m TDH rn, for 24h at 70m,
- So conservatively gets 1,67m TDH/h (70-30=40; 40/24 = 1,67)
- Meaning till deadline they will have 1,67m TDH/h*5,5h= 9,2m TDH more TDH
- So below 40m and probably Articulate will bring it home, right?
@[simo] would be great to have current + 24h window + FC on next cut off date :)
PS: obviously there are assumptions in, 1,67 is conservative, in reality it will be a bit more (maximum being 2,9 for 70/24). So might still be a nailbiter
but perfectly fine for localized
i don't think I would use it for anything network based
1/ TDH
2/ Rep
3/ Quadratic TDH
4/ per address
5/ per address with some other metric qualification: "per address but you need at least 50K TDH"
we should let anyone run whatever voting they want
in localized voting