Oceans of Wisdom

assuming everything goes well, etc, etc, etc

isn't ETH and SOL going to cover 95% of it right now?

(very nicely formatted)

bc they effectively are nicely formatted block explorers

clients (what we call core right now) update automatically

e.g. this wave just voted to give @[maybe] -69 rep bc of poor customer service at his Meme Exchange

so they just trigger internal things

most blocks are internal

that is validated

so you get a block every I dunno 2 minutes or whatever

so internal to 6529 blockchain issues are "easy" - validate by TDH vote, block rewards, transaction rewards, you trust TDH, consensus method is TDH, etc, etc

i mean it does not cost more than if it was 1, right?

this is a good graphical representation of the last 12 months 

I am basically trusting 2-3 chainlink operators with the root value of the network, no way

and one of the things that dragged me where was when I dug into how we could use chainlink to oracle TDH on-chain

and trusted in many ways

centralized

chainlink is quite centralize

if they want to but this overlaps in some ways with chainlink

i think it should be end-user triggered

do we need to pay gas on Tezos to tell Tezos what we are up to, "not on Tezos"

if it does not impact state on Tezos

I don't see why not

can we skip posting it on Sol and Tezos?

Let's say 123457 had an ETH tx

I don't see why not

could we skip posting it on ETH?

but let's say block 123456 was just 6529 blockchain transactions

seems like wasted resources that somehow the network will pay for

is there any point in posting merkle roots for all of them on both ETH and SOL

let's say we have X blocks a day and 95% of them have only 6529 transactions and 4% have ETH tx and 1% have SOL

anything else is wildly inefficient

but then even more so, the person who wants to execute a transaction on one of those chains and needs the oracle should pay for it

yes

BTC is hard btw bc of its limitations

i am saying something different. even if we decided to mint NFTs on 6529 chain tomorrow, being able to transport decisions to ETH is important (and Sol and BTC etc)

"you, the person who is in a rush to do something with 500 gwei gas"

put a bounty for validators to post in high gas situations

we will allow for this, but a world where we retreat to our chain is a mistake. as an individual, I use many chains. hard to imagine a network state should not be able to "use many chains" when any individual in the network can

on core consensus of another chain

you can't impose external chain costs

then they should pay for it

if they really need it during the 500 gwei gas

so they can wait

most of the time it is not time sensitive

on ETH

i think you need to move the cost to the person who wants the transaction

you can't "force" validators to bridge under those conditions, they just won't

and mainnet gas is 400 or something

and they are having some crisis of their own