thsi is vey important to me
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
I never (in any context, including this one) want people to spend their money without a super clear understanding of "what they are spending it on"
when I bought my first BTC, there was a white paper, there was a node, there was a community that was saying 'sure, this could be huge but it is also experimental and you could lose your money" (2013).
I read the paper, I downloaded the node, I bought 1 BTC, it was all very fair and transparent what the situation was
for a variety of reasons most importantly my internal sense of good order
yes but i will not utter that until I have delivered a decentralized blockchain
We enter mania as soon as punk has the word 'fungible token' on the timeline. 😂
and anyway are not going to do anything stupid
it is ok if I can bounce ideas off XX maxis who are ultra-obssessed
that is what I want
and that is great
99% of people who hold a 6529 NFT aren't even in here. 99% are like "we got a cool NFT"
Right. A lot of it is trust that 6529 is working on something. you guys have already gotten a really cool nft collection, and I didnt have a clue about the brain or TDH until I did some more clicking around the past month or so.
and there will for sure be issues the first time around
we need to make sure we have our act together
but I would not want mass influx yet
i think of SZN11 as a bit of a test SZN11. I would be happy with a bit more activity
it is among people who are already in the ecosystem
Probably true. I think last weekends flurry was only a test. NFTs are mostly a running joke to 98% of people, I’d bet.
every 6 mints
we can do something like this
BTC difficulty adjusts every two weeks
the base approach should be algorithmic. the concept should be like BTC difficulty adjustments
yup, @[simo] knows
Anyone else have the issue of the page jumping all the time whenever scrolling up a bit and trying to read something. Most of the time the jump is a comment or 2, but sometimes it’s 100-200 comments of a jump
that is much cleaner than "there was a gas war"
they give you a visible transparent measurable of demand
in any case subscriptions solve this issue
the base approach should be algorithmic. the concept should be like BTC difficulty adjustments
This makes a lot of sense. Though the question is, assuming the post-mint price is above mint price, if you have high TDH/in p0, you would never really stop minting. So a lower edition card would either 1) be worth more immediate post-mint value if your intention was just to sell it or 2) earn more TDH if you held it, further widening the gap in TDH. Is this correct? This is why it seems like the edition size wouldn't be a voted item by TDH but rather an agreed upon algorithm or other menas
:)
when i write the white paper
When will we get to read more about the new 6529 blockchain?
1. I think the edition sizes in general should be on some relatively slow moving trailing average relative to subscriptions relative to mints
2. They should increase more slowly than they drop
3. This should be the general rule. Possibly there are some exceptions TBD but this is the general rule
when the market is hot, there should be a outsized demand to mint and high post-mint prices for those that get to mint. The market will shift and move as we saw after s2
I think once we have a full blockchain it might attract more attention
They won't at all right now
I need to dig into who has been buying and selling in the last week but on the face of it doesn't look like many new entrants to the ecosystem so not sure why minting numbers would change dramatically from those in the last couple of seasons?
1. I do not believe SZN11 will sell out
2. SZN11 has not full decentralization
3. We will evaluate decentralization once we are decentralization
4. I will not receive any cards once we are decentralized
Whole-heartly agree - SZN11 and beyond need to sellout. If most of the new SZNs meme cards go to Punk and Research, it would be hard to say that the decentralization experiment has succeeded. As I recall, one of the rationales for DGMD to put down the bid wall at mint prices is to lead the crowd to the new seasons. Cummunity curations better stepping up to the plate and hitting home runs.
just that it is conceptually possible. i don't think there was any further progress
how far did we get with this ?
Identity will be native to the blockchain
within blockchain. we are migrating consolidation away from ETH
Still on agenda to add ?
even if they set up multiple accounts, there is no extra benefit. they get the same amount of TDH (or less, if they don't get the boosts). That "multiple accounts" is not a hack is built in from the beginning
4. The network of Rep and activity shared between those wallets cannot plausibly have been done by bots from 2021-2024
5. The financial investment to spin up multiple alt accounts is very significant - maybe there are a few but it’s not the majority, and probably none of the top top TDH or Rep holders
correct. TDH is there to support the network. decisions can be set up on any other metric too
Also consider that the system is set up so that TDH makes base network decisions. There will be other things that grow from it that will use Rep for decision making where you may have a lot larger influence than DGMD
email is for boomers! someone / some group of people will have to nominate you with rep then you will be able to submit your finished work.
Also, I have a question , Do I need to email my existing portfolio or a submission to apply for a card in the 6529 ecosystem?
we have finally found "utility"
@[Articulate] be really looking forward to em nudes, be scared ser 😅
not yet I think @[prxt0]
is there a way to search memes by keywords? ie satoshi, summer, vitalik, hardware wallet
everything is going to be super-empowered. intelligence is going to become free ninety nine. the only interesting questions are how it is harnessed / aligned
That was a definite crutch in the book's logic.
On the one hand you have to assume that AGI/ASI + highly intrepid people will unlock new ways to be wildly self-sufficient and productive
On the other hand ... isn't that exactly how it's going to go? In one form or another
The 6529 network isn't *directly* going to give you ASI superpowers
But I think it will keep you able to find real other humans and make aligned decisions without
a) corporate and/or government silos
b) AI capture of the communication networks
we can have a pepe category, a punks category, an xcopy category, an artblocks category, could be fun I think @[prxt0]
pls do
Not high priority at all - but I think we need some pepe emojis like the ones from the pepe discord servers.
I can probably source the files if needed
oh i see. though I am wondering who is going to hack an EOA and then spend money to undo a consolidation :)
I guess the concern is less to do with how many addresses are possible, but more to do with TDH not being transferable.
So if I am holding meme cards long term (which is my situation), if I then create a Safe and migrate my holdings to the Safe, I still need to keep these old addresses consolidated or else I lose the TDH assigned to them.
So then if any of those addresses are compromised, that TDH is lost forever
and keep it permissionless
why not add a 4th wallet
I feel like it would be a good idea to allow for a one-time TDH transfer to either a Safe or AA
also yesterday if not mentioned
Release 2.13.2 :lfg: 
- added full screen (on supported devices) and zooming for Brain images
- fixed 'Open In Browser' of Brain images from mobile apps
- added Mobile and Core app links in the Header Share widget
still need more I/O though
it is probably for the best tbh. it is like ATC in there
Probably just have a seizure if I tried reading that mind
no shitcoin. coins that incent actual transaction validators and pay for gas are fine. this is what BTC does
It’s not a shitcoin. It’s a holy shitcoin
oh
It’s called TDH checkout: each profile can check out one card for up to 69 days. TDH pauses while it’s checked out. after that tdh calculated normally, either it’s in their wallet or it’s not
no
Did you see my TDH preservation solution everyone hated yesterday?
the crypto corollary do not die from the price going up
so I have a long-standing heuristic for tech: "things do not die from being too popular"
In 100 days, the "attacker" who already had a lot of TDH will have a whopping 0.6% of network TDH