what i meant initially was something like this (concept, not necessarily an idea I want to do but conceptually it works). Obviously imagine all the below would have to be generalized, but to get the right idea
1. We rent/buy a 1BR apartment in [wherever]
2. There is an online booking on 6529/core
3. We say (whoever we is, the network or a person)
4. Anyone with TDH > 100K can use it for [free/reduced fee/regular fee]
5. the literal lock, the door itself, opens based on you signing (via your mobile phone) your network identity
Context from
maybe
#39657
2025-03-18 16:00
I see I see
:sunshinerotate:
:gmrotate:
no, you will sign with ETH and it will know specifically it is you
Context from
maybe
#39643
2025-03-18 15:45
@[punk6529] is the idea generally that no two people (in practice) will ever have exactly the same TDH?
yes
Context from
maybe
#39645
2025-03-18 15:49
@[punk6529] is the reason this will work because it is impossible to mimic someone‘s TDH?
When it comes to carbon monoxide (CO), most traditional air purifiers (even very high-end brands like IQAir) aren’t effective at *removing* it because CO is a colorless, odorless gas with very low molecular weight and low adsorption potential. Here are the main points to keep in mind:
1. **Carbon monoxide is best handled by prevention and detection**
- **Prevention**: Keep heat sources and appliances properly maintained (e.g., regular checks of stoves, furnaces, chimneys).
- **Detection**: Install a **carbon monoxide detector/alarm** in your home. This is the single most important step. If CO levels rise, the alarm should go off immediately.
2. **Ventilation** is critical if there is ever a CO incident
- If a CO leak is suspected or an alarm goes off, the first step is to **open windows and doors** to bring in fresh air.
- You should exit the home if you suspect high CO levels and call emergency services if needed.
3. **Filters generally can’t solve carbon monoxide**
- Standard “HEPA” filters trap **particulate matter** (e.g., dust, smoke, allergens), not gases.
- Activated carbon filters can handle many volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and odors, but **carbon monoxide is not easily adsorbed** because of how it behaves at room temperature and how small the molecule is. A typical carbon-based filter will not reliably remove CO.
- Some lab or industrial systems use **catalytic oxidation** to convert CO into CO₂, but these are not common in regular home air purifiers. They require very specific materials or catalysts and usually operate at higher temperatures.
4. **If you’re in a wildfire situation**
- An IQAir (or any high-end HEPA + activated carbon purifier) can help greatly with **smoke particulates and many harmful VOCs**, but it will not eliminate carbon monoxide from smoke. It *does* help mitigate a lot of other combustion byproducts.
- In wildfire conditions, staying indoors, using a purifier, and keeping doors/windows sealed is typically recommended to reduce *particle* (PM2.5) exposure. But again, if CO specifically becomes a concern (for instance, heavy smoke infiltration, or malfunctioning appliances), you must vent and get fresh air or leave the area.
5. **Key takeaway**
- Use your IQAir (or any robust air purifier) for **particulates and general VOCs**.
- **Install and rely on a dedicated CO detector** for carbon monoxide alerts.
- In a true CO emergency, **no air purifier can protect you**—you want immediate ventilation and possibly to evacuate until the issue is resolved.
In short, there isn’t really a direct “filter” solution for carbon monoxide in typical household air purifiers. The best strategy is maintaining proper ventilation, having a reliable CO alarm, and taking immediate action (opening windows, leaving the home) if levels rise.
you can't rely on filters
open windows etc
you have to get out with carbon monoxide
I mean alarm bells should be going off
"open a window"
Context from
johndoe8891
#39628
2025-03-18 15:25
One think I didn't figure out is what to use in case a carbon monoxide issue happens. I need a filter for that if there is.
Swiss Engineering living up to its reputation in this case
Context from
johndoe8891
#39624
2025-03-18 15:20
100% I have never seen anything work like it I can see when my wife cooks based on the air status :)
i think on TDH we are at about 2013-ish levels of inflation

once we are fully running, he will come along
known balaji for a very long time. we have almost identical views of the world theoretically but we implement in quite different ways
Context from
EzMonet
#39616
2025-03-18 15:07
Balaji would be a natural 6529er
but rock solid
pricey
I think they are the most robust in the world
have their HEPA filters everywhere
i am like Customer of the Year for IQAir (also possibly easier in Europe)
https://www.iqair.com/
Context from
johndoe8891
#39530
2025-03-18 13:15
I use IQAir
was in the early years
it is less inflationary than BTC
at the end of year 2, assuming someone else buys all the year 2 cards and does not sell them, what is the inflation rate
"you buy all the cards in Y1 and vault them and forget them"
the way to think about it is as follows
1%
it will be about 1^
and by year 10
is about 16%
I think year 3 annual inflation

and the chart will look something like this
this is not how I think about TDH inflation.
I think about 'dilution' if you HODL. in that case, it is already quite less inflationary. If you sell, well you lose your TDH anyway, so that calculation does not matter.
so the right metric is how much new potential TDH is released each year
Context from
golden618
#39509
2025-03-18 12:36
The network TDH daily gain is about 0.2% per day, or 75% annualized. It is hugely inflationary at this stage: this is how the network is secured, by being inflationary. This inflationary rate will drop down to about 10% annually in about 10 years. I think this is one of the reasaons why @[punk6529] wants us to think long term - 2030s as the target date, because we need it for TDH security.
and we should fund as a proof of concept in 2026
but I would say this is something that can / should exist
like buying alpaca socks with BTC
in the beginning, it will be more proof of concept
and I don't see any reason (technically) it would not work
but hardware that works on TDH seems inevitable
not for ASICs/mining
6529 HW for sure will happen
Context from
maybe
#39577
2025-03-18 14:16
Omg 6529 hardware. still intrigued by the tdh door locks
it would be great
Context from
Juicy
#39411
2025-03-18 07:22
Government spending on the blockchain is quite a step forward, and something I hope to see all governments start to move towards over the coming years.
gmeme
yes it is LIFO
Context from
SunRunner
#39145
2025-03-17 17:14
but it's last in, first out, right? so if you have 10 editions of one card and 10k TDH, you can be sure you burn equal or less to the avg, so selling one edition will burn max 1k TDH.
out of the shadowlands!
Context from
Tharwin
#39135
2025-03-17 16:44
Welcome back to the visible world ;-)
back!
Context from
david
#39132
2025-03-17 16:43
lets test it
this is correct. the self-selected group has this philosophy more than almost any other group in crypto (this is not a happy lucky coincidence - the whole approach has been oriented to attract this group)
Context from
DGMD
#39045
2025-03-17 14:15
We are in fact a very small, pioneering group of memers and collectors. The way forward is together. Being around every day I know this group has the highest concentration of people who are focused on the greater good of the space and a focus on moving forward into the decentralized future. I think that belief will be rewarded someday too, but am very happy to be collecting when most of the flippers and $ focused folks don't understand why I am doing such things, they are not the co-collectors I want around anyway.
in the context of what the goals are
this has always been my view