19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38864 2025-03-17 11:31
this is not for a swap but for new additions right?
Context from Vantekai #38855 2025-03-17 11:26
What do we think? Tweak/enhancements etc before I tidy it up ? [https://6529stats.xyz/tdh-calculator](https://6529stats.xyz/tdh-calculator) ![Seize](https://d3lqz0a4bldqgf.cloudfront.net/drops/author_12cdbc7e-9e07-4f51-9223-ef627ecb97f0/2dae8134-2abd-4460-92fa-53cb4a67aad9.png) [@punk6529](http://localhost:6529/punk6529) [@Shelby](http://localhost:6529/Shelby) as you guys mentioned it plus anyone else with feedback obviously
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38863 2025-03-17 11:30
no need to start over
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38862 2025-03-17 11:30
that we need to update ASAP
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38861 2025-03-17 11:30
yes as noted, we have an extensive PPT
Context from Articulate #38838 2025-03-17 11:04
I would ask 6529 and @[DarrenSRS] about this before we crowd-source one I'll bet they have a doc or explainer or something for artists like Coldie and etc to bring them up to speed. Maybe we can use that as a starting point
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38860 2025-03-17 11:29
we can updated the SZN10 PPT to make it more updated. @[DarrenSRS] pls make a new copy of it SZN11, give edit rights to anyone with link and let's give it a shot here today
Context from Sert #38836 2025-03-17 11:00
Not sure if anyone’s brought this up yet, but I think we could put together a **doc on engaging artists**. I’ve 2+ artists in my collection who would be perfect for memes imho! Besides just sharing the project’s vision, we should also provide an explanation how voting and consensus work. A comprehensive overview of what we’re asking for: why, potential earnings (of course), guarantees (none – we’re 100% decentralized) etc. We could start creating a shared doc file
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38832 2025-03-17 10:47
with the AI tools
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38831 2025-03-17 10:47
anyway worth trying it
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38830 2025-03-17 10:47
that's what people say but I am a bit skeptical that people have the attention span!
Context from Vantekai #38822 2025-03-17 10:37
Doesn't everyone want video these days so I'm told?
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38811 2025-03-17 10:32
in terms of what is most likely to be read / viewed / understood
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38810 2025-03-17 10:32
imho
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38809 2025-03-17 10:32
text first, video second.
Context from Vantekai #38807 2025-03-17 10:29
So being lazy in case anyone here has suggestions (@[MintFace] springs to mind) I think I could do some explainers for what features I have on site as it seems many dont know what's on there I'm just not the type to put my ugly mug and voice to create a video. I once did some videos on YT for my ecommerce products and the consensus was I am the dullest man alive on video. So bad that was actually the appeal and some have thousands of views LOL I'm guessing there are a tonne of AI options for me to create videos and it does subtitles and / or voice over etc ? Suggestions before I google?
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38797 2025-03-17 10:12
thanks @[prxt0]
Context from prxt0 #38775 2025-03-17 08:54
@[david] your pfp should be back! did you also try to change username?
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38776 2025-03-17 08:54
i think most days TDH will go up
Context from Juicy #38752 2025-03-17 08:08
Yeah 1.16m burned out of 709m total TDH isn't that much, relatively speaking, especially considering the volume of the past 24 hrs
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38729 2025-03-17 07:47
like satoshis :)
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38727 2025-03-17 07:47
what we could have is names for sub TDH
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38726 2025-03-17 07:47
no idea
Context from maybe #38719 2025-03-17 07:46
you think the Bitcoin leveraged shorter gets liq'd?
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38715 2025-03-17 07:46
whale bidder knows something
Context from maybe #38711 2025-03-17 07:45
i was wondering if you would manipulate for the lulz
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38710 2025-03-17 07:44
i see an opportunity!
Context from maybe #38707 2025-03-17 07:44
polymarket on when punk drops white paper
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38702 2025-03-17 07:42
but this is anyway WP stuff when formalized
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38701 2025-03-17 07:41
sure
Context from maybe #38699 2025-03-17 07:41
right right except what i could be correct or incorrect about is Prxt0 seemed to have it coded using max edition size and it always worked because we've never had bigger
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38700 2025-03-17 07:41
nobody edited text today
Context from prxt0 #38698 2025-03-17 07:41
(or used to say)
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38697 2025-03-17 07:41
if it changes it will change explicitly and via discussion but i think it is fine as is
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38695 2025-03-17 07:40
it means exactly what it says
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38694 2025-03-17 07:40
i wrote the formula, it does not have an exception for >3941
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38691 2025-03-17 07:40
i very much am not part of this "we" who just discovered this today :)
Context from maybe #38678 2025-03-17 07:38
glad we discovered this now
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38690 2025-03-17 07:39
everyone has the same amount of the network anyway
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38688 2025-03-17 07:39
is 100% neutral
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38686 2025-03-17 07:39
adding two 0s to everyone's balance
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38685 2025-03-17 07:39
but obviously just like with currency
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38684 2025-03-17 07:39
we can deal with these happy issues when they emerge
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38682 2025-03-17 07:38
and it works ok
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38681 2025-03-17 07:38
we have had fractions all along
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38680 2025-03-17 07:38
but I am not sure it matters so much
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38677 2025-03-17 07:38
it is just 'add zeros'
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38675 2025-03-17 07:38
it is not 'recalculate'
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38674 2025-03-17 07:38
or whatever
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38673 2025-03-17 07:38
but to multiply everything by 100
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38672 2025-03-17 07:38
don't like that, the answer is not to 'recalculate"
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38669 2025-03-17 07:38
if we don
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38668 2025-03-17 07:37
that card will have a less than 1 TDH rate
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38665 2025-03-17 07:37
if and when we do
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #38664 2025-03-17 07:37
yes because we have never had an edition of more than 3941
Context from prxt0 #38662 2025-03-17 07:37
we have never had a card gaining less than 1 tdh per day
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38663 2025-03-17 07:37
but obviously the logical way to do it is "the same way"
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38661 2025-03-17 07:37
because we have never had an edition that big
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38659 2025-03-17 07:36
we have never had to address > 3941
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38658 2025-03-17 07:36
TDH has always worked this way
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38657 2025-03-17 07:36
we have always had fractional TDH
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38656 2025-03-17 07:36
3941/305 = 12.92
punk6529 Memes-Chat #38655 2025-03-17 07:35
guys come on