but the actual node, the consensus logic will be written from scratch in Go
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
there will be Core Front-End that will continue to be electron
now we are splitting
we started with Core = Electron
even the desktop software is going this way
so you remain grounded by 'real world users'
each level going a step further down
you have to do it in iteration loops
correct
@[david] is corect
but will get solved
and the output is still a bit cringe
i try here and there
the current ones are not quite good enough
and develop a decent mental model
will be good enough to absorb my tweets and discord writing
i think the models by the end of the year
this is a good idea even if I don't die.
May sound stupid, but beyond following his upcoming whitepaper, I've been thinking that what could be very beneficial for the transition and progressive delegation/decentralisation is the AI twin of 6529. As AI gets better, knowing how much he's using it and how much the system must be learning about his thought process, an AI version of 6529 could become our guide in moments of uncertainty for both strategic direction but also to unlock decision making when we get stuck or too divided/fragmented - and I'm not even joking about the value I see on this eternal version of 6529
I think realistically there are two periods:
1. until we launch decentralized version. it would be good if i do not die during this period
2. afterwards: the faster you all step up the better. of course, for me, I would also prefer not to die in this period either but that becomes more a personal thing
yep, though that is best case scenario and not always something we can control, from a risk management perspective, how do we prepare ourselves from worst case scenarios, like 6529 having an fatal accident or drastic health issue? how can we mitigate the risk of the project dying quickly because we have not completed the long transition we're expecting?
6529 Geek Squad
eventually we need to send someone to England to give him tech support how to get here
btw brain to discord ratio is awesome today
@[boredsurgeon] wondering where everyone went
i am very very efficient and work a lot of hours
and from my understanding, you still have a 'real world' job and responsibilities. how dafuq are you this efficient/effective?
@[simo] @[prxt0] @[ragne]
It’s a little difficult for mobile. I’ll be on the lookout for some upgrades. Hopefully they allow us to hide all that filled up space up top 😂
@[simo] @[prxt0] @[ragne]
Is it possible to search stream for specific text and by ”from:” like discord?
not the main event
finance is a support function
correct
I think where a lot of DAOs go wrong is that all of their decisions revolve around finances. I am now seeing both the importance and the brilliance of the DDN.
something like that
but each month you can adjust
everyone auto-enrolled into the what the group decided to fund
and nuance: 'veto' should be opt-out
etc
giving them security et
including contracting, paying people for long-term
i do not want to limit ourselves to backwards grants. I want the full set of capabilities that businesses, governments, non-profits have
One of the interesting cases for project grants in Web3 that I explored to some degree is Gitcoin, which provides the tools, expertise, and services that empower ecosystems to launch and scale impactful grants programs—without the administrative burden. As far as I understood the grants were provided backwards based on delivery/impact - not sure if their approach would be relevant here but any thoughts on this?
with your specific money
but then you get to choose if you are going to fund that specific thing
bc everyone was busy
ok maybe we passed that vote
"this approach gives a second layer of defense"
Punk and Ruskin are the only ones to show up to vote and push through "champagne for punk and ruskin every breakfast"
not to say we can't take on projects more than 1 month long
i picked a month as an example
your units go back in the pool
something
that if you don't fund
there just has to be some period
we should be able to fund longer-term
Also fwiw in the example above I dont love the idea that the core team go to 1-month contracts
That’s not a great work environment - i realise just an example but we can think of better work for pay models for sure
this approach gives a second layer of defense
in treasuries that are just spent by majority vote
you see stuff like this