yeah it is a good question. it is all of the following:
1. Many of them are doing important roles that are invisible. eg. @[itsjpower] handles all our financial, tax, audit etc across everything. it is painful and annoying. @[6529Guardian] is doing legal and lobbying work, etc.
2. Some of them are not paid by the meme drop revenue but by the fund. some are not paid at all (the rich ones)
3. I think they should post here more and I have told them the same.
let's see what happens in the coming weeks., but surely it is not correct that the idea is they are doing nothing, luxuriating in TDH and the reason we know they are doing nothing is because they have not posted here.
4. I think once we decentralize, they should not get cards anymore in any case, nor should the museum I think or me.
5. I have a fairly radical view of the decentralization aspects. like once we are appropriately decentralized, there should be no company to say, pay @[simo]. But of course it is a huge benefit to all of us that Simo does get paid. Not just Simo but many others
6. But then we have to figure out how we do it together - i have a specific proposal to discuss with you all - most of the DAO funding models suck. I think I have an idea how to do it, but it is going to be a big experiment. I have never seen it done this way before.
7. I can tell you what it is NOT going to be. It is not going to be the "Foundation" model. That is too centralized for me.
8. So it is going to be interesting. You are correctly pointing out in a decentralized model nobody should get a free meme card. but also I will point out than in a decentralized model, we collectively will need to figure out how to get a paycheck to the team members we think are important every month.
This is going to cut both ways. If we go decentralized then responsibility for "meeting payroll" is not just mine, it is all of yours too
Context from
AnimatedNFT
#31613
2025-03-03 21:47
krybharat 6529guardian unnamed wallet 6529fundszn4 prxt0 bonafidehan unnamed wallet darren leni6529 unnamed wallet punk 6529fundszn3 itsjpower 6529er ABNY 6529museum teexels bluegod batsoupyum 6529fundszn1 6529fundszn2 3 unnamed wallets loneranger noone0x ACthecollector
the memes move in mysterious ways
Context from
mememaxis
#31604
2025-03-03 20:52
super weird indeed, before mint the edition was wrongly written as 329 too, seems like a sign
it is not me
oh lol
what face are we talking about
Context from
AnimatedNFT
#31560
2025-03-03 19:50
maybe punk 20 years ago. He is too much of a boomer now for that to be his face present day.
we can brainstorm good ideas
Context from
fertilejim
#31496
2025-03-03 17:02
I got two. Am open to whatever @6529er and @6529 propose to do and/or community decides. Maybe we can turn the excess supply into a fund for s.th. useful for the project?
https://x.com/punk6529/status/1896606467404529847
not bots
lol
in the beginning our biggest issue is getting anyone to come
we will play it by ear
Context from
GhostPepper
#31398
2025-03-03 15:28
I think so too as a start. Someone who buys a floor card can rep someone to level 1 every 5-10 days depending on which card. Maybe raise the bar as overall REP increases.
yes let us know!
Context from
vesper
#31171
2025-03-03 01:02
Just got the Technological Republic by Alex Karp (CEO of Palantir). Proposed a tech positive future. Think it may align well with this group. Will report back in a couple weeks when done.
but can you please take a look tomorrow
I do not know if @[prxt0] the Core app has gotten out of sync with front-end
so perhaps he can share here
@[BatSoupYum] also had a lot of issues with Core this weekend
@[prxt0] is OOO until tomorrow
we can do a lot that way
that is rep = 25
the point is someone needs to vouch for them
level = 1 is fine I think
Context from
maybe
#31349
2025-03-03 13:28
I think you should use the lowest possible level barrier and adjust up only when there are issues
it is a serious deterrent vis paying $8 for a premium subscription
and they are back to square 0
and someone gives them negative rep
and then are annoying
tie up capital
they spend money
and it is risky for the bots
we can always move up the level as needed
Context from
mememaxis
#31293
2025-03-03 08:39
bots bought tdh could rep bots if the level required is low?
"no tech or internet service failed from too much demand" is a good rule
not the failure case
is the luxury problem
in any case, lots of people wanting to get in the club
etc etc
and those xx,xxx people will know the next x,xxx,xxx people
consolidate at that level
we have a good start for the next step
if we do that and get to xx,xxx validated people here
we should be able to personally validate anyone in the NFT space
which is the starting point for all this
cumulatively know every single person in the NFT space
I think the XXX people with TDH and interest
not elitist
is fine
come hang out with real people
i think the bots on twitter are doing the job for us
is there any risk that the NFT community is going to think we are smug cult? they all think we are crazy
Context from
Vantekai
#31263
2025-03-03 08:32
Important how gating/access is sold
Don't want to come across as smug cult
I do see more posts about people bemoaning bots so selling gating as anti bot somehow is a good start
this is all very interesting because rubber is going to meet the road here
but posting requires level
can be basically viewable even with level=0