19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #773742 2026-03-12 22:23
skin in the game is more accurate
Context from RegularDad #773740 2026-03-12 22:22
I agree with the general idea, but how does minting equal qualified? Because increased relative interest? Maybe qualified isn’t the right term. It’s a different type of skin in the game
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773739 2026-03-12 22:22
but it is all a bit abstract
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773736 2026-03-12 22:22
and I always tell people "you can just make a wave and use rep to vote on any mechanism you want"
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773735 2026-03-12 22:21
is provides alignment/security for the network itself
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773733 2026-03-12 22:21
their job and what TDH does and the only thing TDH does
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773732 2026-03-12 22:21
and obviously the answer is "they can't"
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773731 2026-03-12 22:21
which is "but how can high TDH holders make all the decisions in a country"
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773730 2026-03-12 22:20
and I have not articulated well
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773729 2026-03-12 22:20
it is interesting, it touches upon a question that I get a lot
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773727 2026-03-12 22:20
but in principle our system should be scalable enough to provide a mechanism for people to do this
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773726 2026-03-12 22:20
none of us are qualified to do this
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773725 2026-03-12 22:20
but what if it is "plant botany classification in the SE Ecuadorian mountains"
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773724 2026-03-12 22:19
maybe this bunch of art collectooors we are can do a decent job anyway with @[maybe] photos
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773723 2026-03-12 22:19
and it will weaken decision-making in a case like this re societal scaling
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773720 2026-03-12 22:19
because TDH is strictly speaking wrong
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773719 2026-03-12 22:18
in practice today, it will make almost no difference, but we should do it correctly
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773718 2026-03-12 22:18
1/ vote by number of cards minted 2/ vote by TDH of people who minted 3/ vote by TDH of people who minted x # of cards minted 4/ any of the above x 70% and TDH x 30% etc, but the above are indicative main patterns
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773716 2026-03-12 22:17
now what are potential approaches
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773715 2026-03-12 22:16
but it is not correct that it is TDH
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773712 2026-03-12 22:15
it is why it escaped me earlier
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773711 2026-03-12 22:15
so it is a theoretical point
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773708 2026-03-12 22:15
a lot of people who are going to mint
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773705 2026-03-12 22:15
ok true, but should someone who did not mint/subscribe vote on the collection funded by people who did mint/subscribe/paid for it
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773703 2026-03-12 22:14
you might think "but the network said via TDH to push the card to be minted"
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773701 2026-03-12 22:13
it is not necessarily the right metric for subnetwork decisions
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773700 2026-03-12 22:13
TDH is the right metric for network decisions (what gets in the memes is a network decision)
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773699 2026-03-12 22:13
my permanent background 6529 architecture process in my head said "whoa cowboy", do not hit "post"
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773697 2026-03-12 22:12
and I was ready to press [tweetstorm]
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773695 2026-03-12 22:11
but somewhere between the time @[6529er] did the work
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773693 2026-03-12 22:11
initially my simplistic idea was the first
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773692 2026-03-12 22:11
should this vote be: - TDH, dominated by a bunch of people who were not really into this idea and while we appreciate @[maybe] enough to get him to the main stage #1, nobody is super pumped to mint it or - the people who minted it or - some hybrid
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773689 2026-03-12 22:10
and now we go to select the limnal spaces of Arizona State University and Santa Fe
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773687 2026-03-12 22:09
but @[maybe] has done "onboarding"
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773686 2026-03-12 22:09
and so by definition these people don't even have a lot of TDH
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773684 2026-03-12 22:09
@maybe goes and gathers all the top arizona/new mexico photographers and art collectors to get into this and rustles up the $60K to do this
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #773682 2026-03-12 22:08
wow, you say the word and he is summoned
Context from giulioaprin #773681 2026-03-12 22:08
you said desert?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773679 2026-03-12 22:07
and let's take it one step further
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773677 2026-03-12 22:07
and those people who are super into it mint like crazy and generate a 20 ETH fund to do this
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #773675 2026-03-12 22:07
sorry southwest
Context from punk6529 #773671 2026-03-12 22:06
a group of you led by fearless desert warlord @[maybe] decide you want to make a collection of i dunno limnal spaces in the southeast
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773674 2026-03-12 22:07
but there are like 30 people who are super into it
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773672 2026-03-12 22:06
and for whatever reason, everyone else is like ok, cool bro, but not super duper into it
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773671 2026-03-12 22:06
a group of you led by fearless desert warlord @[maybe] decide you want to make a collection of i dunno limnal spaces in the southeast
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #773666 2026-03-12 22:05
let's think through an example