skin in the game is more accurate
Context from
RegularDad
#773740
2026-03-12 22:22
I agree with the general idea, but how does minting equal qualified? Because increased relative interest? Maybe qualified isn’t the right term. It’s a different type of skin in the game
but it is all a bit abstract
and people kindof nod
you don't have to use TDH
and I always tell people "you can just make a wave and use rep to vote on any mechanism you want"
is provides alignment/security for the network itself
their job and what TDH does and the only thing TDH does
and obviously the answer is "they can't"
which is "but how can high TDH holders make all the decisions in a country"
and I have not articulated well
it is interesting, it touches upon a question that I get a lot
who are qualified
but in principle our system should be scalable enough to provide a mechanism for people to do this
none of us are qualified to do this
but what if it is "plant botany classification in the SE Ecuadorian mountains"
maybe this bunch of art collectooors we are can do a decent job anyway with @[maybe] photos
and it will weaken decision-making in a case like this re societal scaling
because TDH is strictly speaking wrong
in practice today, it will make almost no difference, but we should do it correctly
1/ vote by number of cards minted
2/ vote by TDH of people who minted
3/ vote by TDH of people who minted x # of cards minted
4/ any of the above x 70% and TDH x 30%
etc, but the above are indicative main patterns
now what are potential approaches
but it is not correct that it is TDH
it is why it escaped me earlier
so it is a theoretical point
have high TDH
a lot of people who are going to mint
now in practice
ok true, but should someone who did not mint/subscribe vote on the collection funded by people who did mint/subscribe/paid for it
you might think "but the network said via TDH to push the card to be minted"
it is not necessarily the right metric for subnetwork decisions
TDH is the right metric for network decisions (what gets in the memes is a network decision)
my permanent background 6529 architecture process in my head said "whoa cowboy", do not hit "post"
and I was ready to press [tweetstorm]
but somewhere between the time @[6529er] did the work
initially my simplistic idea was the first
should this vote be:
- TDH, dominated by a bunch of people who were not really into this idea and while we appreciate @[maybe] enough to get him to the main stage #1, nobody is super pumped to mint it or
- the people who minted it or
- some hybrid
and now we go to select the limnal spaces of Arizona State University and Santa Fe
which is great!
but @[maybe] has done "onboarding"
and so by definition these people don't even have a lot of TDH
@maybe goes and gathers all the top arizona/new mexico photographers and art collectors to get into this and rustles up the $60K to do this
wow, you say the word and he is summoned
Context from
giulioaprin
#773681
2026-03-12 22:08
you said desert?
to push the example
and let's take it one step further
and those people who are super into it mint like crazy and generate a 20 ETH fund to do this
sorry southwest
Context from
punk6529
#773671
2026-03-12 22:06
a group of you led by fearless desert warlord @[maybe] decide you want to make a collection of i dunno limnal spaces in the southeast
but there are like 30 people who are super into it
and for whatever reason, everyone else is like ok, cool bro, but not super duper into it
a group of you led by fearless desert warlord @[maybe] decide you want to make a collection of i dunno limnal spaces in the southeast
let's think through an example