Oceans of Wisdom

@[maybe] @[punk6529] About the "REP X Proxy X Credit Boundaries thing". Now I remembered the original reasoning behind it. And the more I'm thinking how to change it the more I understand how the original reasoning made sense. So let me write it out here: 1. You ARE giving someone a proxy grant to REP on your behalf with 1000 units of REP. 2. You are NOT giving someone 1000 units of TDH to use as REP as they please. Those are two very different things and currently @maybe is assuming (2) not (1). The proxy feature was never meant as a way to give away yourleftover REP to someone so they could use it instead. It was meant to give someone limited privileges to log in as you and act on your behalf. And the credit system was put to place so the grantee wouldn't step out of line and ruin everything you've build by giving out REP. If we would change it to "here is X units of REP I wont use anyway, so you use it" then it would be a very different thing. More like xTDH or smth. And then it would not act as a guardrail for proxy privileges.

this is very non-trivial at the moment.

I don't think they will give website access, It's just a place to discuss ideas I think as a collective and then if it's worth it then it will move to the devs?

This is more for ideas to improve UI, Add text to make it easier for newcomers etc. So that people can hash out ideas before going to the developers to not put more "load" on them than needed

GMeme @[Zoku], @[punk6529], @[Rocketgirl], @[maybe] and everyone else! I created a wave where we can detect improvements for the 6529 website, and see who can support in any way with quick fixes, copy, etc. Everyone is invited to contribute! https://6529.io/waves/3cbbc05f-ce7c-4980-b803-b6bcf90257a4

Amazing, has there been any progress on finalizing the xTDh design (eg who pays for indexing collections over time)

there is no posibility to change the metadata of a Meme Card right ?

Not sure if this is the right place, but will give a try here. Following yesterday’s discussion in the bar, I wanted to open a few questions, not as solutions, but as ideas to try to keep and eye on. If concentrated voting power is our new old gatekeeper that tends to compress taste and reward coordination over discovery, maybe the challenge is to rethink what we incentivize in curation. – What if we reward curators who surface works before they receive strong consensus, rather than those who vote once outcomes feel “safe”. – What if we introduce a time-based or discovery-based multipliers that decay as attention concentrates. – What if we measure curatorial impact retroactively: did this vote help bring a genuinely new signal into the system? Probably very hard tho since this is a soft ground area. None of this is about punishing capital or influence (those forces will always exist). I'm simply raising these questions to try to find better ideas and, perhaps from there, we can design our technology to incentivize a counterweight to plutocratic dynamics.

i see what you mean so what happened is: - 06/02 00:01 TDH calculation took place - at this point your card had TDH Rate 23.6 - this is because the edition size at the time (before the airdrops to research.6529.eth) was 167 so 3941 (hodl index) / 167 = 23.6 -- causing your tdh to overshoot for the day - later on 06/02 the airdrop to research.6529 was done to complete the drop to edition size 310 - then 07/02 00:01 new TDH calculation - at this point your card had tdh 12.71 (3941/310) - so basically there was a brief overestimation of your TDH (and therefore tdh rate) on 06/02 which rebalanced when the edition size was finalized

so currently you cant create external collections based groups. until simo gets to this

hmmm... haven't really thought about that. currently the trophy represents a winner of #[The Memes - Main Stage] not any meme card artist. But I understand how from artists perspective it maybe one and the same. not sure... @[simo] what do you think?

Because of cycles or just human adoption pace?

im taking a 6529flag whenever im climbing a big mountain next. For a 8,000m peak im out of resources but will do that too happily

explain