the bots are there
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,115
matching drops
#1442026
2026-09-16 21:56
our substance now vastly exceeds our presentation of our substance
and be able to be red-pilled by themselves
let's say "someone who knows that rabby is and what an NFT is"
but we need a lot of work for someone to come
i am taking on little things here and there
yes and CTA to subscriptions I think which is mix of "why would I want to do this in the first place" and "not making the core CTA of this whole project impossible to find and do"
would you say goals are:
a) make it easy to grok what is happening here
b) more fun
c) work with machines on complex tasks effectively
and the whole process of getting an agreed page, getting it actually deployed should not start with the hardest page (home page)
at are completely lame
there are many much much easier pages to do
let's see if we can deliver one improved page, do not start with the home page
and he said he wants to do them all but i think its ambitious
but more of the vibe of the memes it is not there
not cheesy fun
but also our site with all our meme stuff should be more fun
but not only improved in traditional ways
they can certainly be improved!
btw @[arsonic] and I were taking a look at redoing the designs of some of the pages of the site. I don't know where he is at with it but he's obviously better than me at the output
the meta system to manage that does not exist yet
it gets chaotic
when you have 10 devs and each have 10 agents and each are running multiple subagents that are both geniuses but also lacking context and also get autistic about things like deployments
github is ok at human pace
is that it is stressing out github way of working
generally and you see this now on all agentic heavy workflows
is the key thing he is trying to solve
the agentic interaction in an opensource concept
and was laughing inside because I was like "oh, it is a version of what we are doing"
i looked at it
it is conceptually in the exact same lane
as a group
I am still slightly not 100% about our ability to take on complex projects
that is infrastructure for us and others using us to take on complex projects
and then of course if we have that
realistcally all of us also armed with our bot friends
until we have something that we can start chewing through much more complex parts of the blockchain
and keep iterating the approach
and see what works and does not
so partially I want to feel my way through this
i do not think just pointing everyone to github would get the ideal outcome
but this is not the starting and end point
obviously there is "github"
so we can drive complex projects to high levels of confidence, assurance
that takes into account human expertise but also mostly going to be human driven bot expertise
and so I am trying to think through what is best practice collaboration infrastructure
it is much less complicated than "building a blockchain"
however complicated this is
and I have another goal here
it is not "look at a few files and give some feedback"
so there will be a common journey of learning and discovery here in august
so what you will see here is a combination of a) things that contract should do, b) what issues we have had operationally with the memes that we want to solve (e.g. splitting royalties), c) what needs to be in place for this to last 50-100 years, d) how do we handle provenance and e) hardest of all, imagine this is all run by a decentralized network and needs to be hardened that way
in my 'life'
I have also bought a lot of ERC-721