you bought no cards
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
and the for year 2 to year 10
assume you bought all the year 1 cards
so let's go the other way
so 1/46 or about 2%
and year 10 rolls around and adds 1 more year worth of TDH
so 9 + 8 + 7 + 6 +5 + 4 +3 + 2 +1 = 45
Year 9 x 1 = 1
Year 8 x 2 = 2
Year 7 x 3 = 3
Year 6 x 4 = 4
Year 1 x 9= 9
Year 2 x 8 = 8
Year 3 x 7 = 7
Year 4 x 6 = 6
Year 5 x 5 = 5
at end of year ten, how much TDH is there
so let's do year 10
the key thing to understand is there is a fixed amount of new TDH creation capacity created every year
because meme cards are sold and TDH is destroyed
once we understand it this way, we know that in real life the inflation is even lower
let's do the math and the reasoning as if every meme card is bought and no meme cards are ever sold
but let's ignore them for now because they make the math and the reasoning harder
sales obviously make inflation lower
the easiest way to reason about this is to ignore sales
the network TDH is not growing as a square annually
i am not sure I agree with your math
Thank you for the replies @[punk6529] and I agree with you. I was viewing it from a different angle and I used "inflation" loosely. The angle I viewed is this: if an investor buys (or owns) a fixed fraction of the network TDH today (say 1%), HODL and doesn't participate in the future seasons, how does his/her share of the network TDH decrease over time T? My answer is 1/T, as the total network TDH increases as T^2 while the investor's TDH increases only linearly with T. So it will half in 2 years, and drop to 10% in 10 years, due to the "inflation" of the network TDH.
no, not at all. people can own 6529 for the normal reasons they own a network token
What about TDH calculated over fungible tokens? Wouldn't it make sense to calculate it from $6529? Or is it an unnecessary inflation factor? Again, for someone, owning pure $6529 instead of NFT might be more comfortable.
correct. the order is the other way
There is no way that $6529 could generate TDH as a fungible token
no there is nothing SZN specific to this discussion
gm team
I find inflation counterintuitive and not my strong point
I’d love if someone can explain how Szn2 holders are affected? That’s not me but it’s an interesting example where supply increased significantly during Szn2 (TDH per card dropped sharply)
they already think I am crazy with the JPGs so it is fine
Thinking punk is going to take a beating from his bitcoin maxi friends when the WP comes out regardless how good it is ):
dunno if it is @[GelatoGenesis] will know
Oh interesting if it’s in the api I’ll add it
"who has the most fungible coins at a single point in time" is a much weaker metric
yes
I was thinking about early/founder power of TDH. The ”institutional knowledge“ gained through time is a valuable asset, particularly In a job or project lIke this. TDH captures that in a way few things can
fully agree except for the dying part. Bryan Johnson has assured me that this is no longer necessary
Wen you die will you release the Daemon?
1/ more on this. I filter these design questions through the question of "it is a country"
2/ how much influence should the "founders" have vs people who come later vs people who come even later, etc etc
3/ well, the founding fathers of USA had and still have a ton of influence. they wrote the constitution. we still use it! but we have also changed some things also
4/ so I go through scenario by scenario trying to ensure that:
a) we respect the wishes / goals / contribution of the early founders
b) we allow for new entrants
5/ I think in this logic, the setup is very very good
a) If you had no inflation at all, you lock in all the power to the entrants in the first 2-3 years, this does not make sense. we want more people, we want to grow, things are going to change in the future and so on. So you need inflation
b) If you have too much inflation, people won't commit early when it is riskier, when you have to go on the Oregon Trail and fight to get to California. Obviously if you get to California in 1870, you can get a larger relative share easier than if you go in 1970
c) We have exponentially declining inflation, like BTC but faster. I think the rate is OK for TDH
d) So I think early explorers are well considered
e) how about new people? Well, they start off small, but the longer they HODL, the larger their relative power is vs the newer people and the people who sell
f) what about sellers? there will always be sellers. it is normal and good. life changes, people need money, people will die (sad but true) and so on. once they have sold, we do not shame them at all, but they no longer have skin in the game in the state in the same way, their power reduces and everyone else's power increases.
This is also healthy and correct
g) BTC does not have this, basically no blockchains have this, I think this is an improvement on the current state in this regard
this is exactly right. when i calculate inflation, i am taking the worst case scenario that everyone HODLs. obviously the reality is that inflation is even lower because people do sell and burn TDH.
i think the right way to think about it is how much relative "power" early vs later adopters should have. and as it is now, the early adopters have a lot of power, more than early BTC adopters so long as they don't sell. of course, if they sell they should have no power, just like you don't have the ability to do transactions in BTC if you sell your BTC
as promised we do a little bit of quality of life stuff in this cycle
🚨🚨we have emojis now. open call for more custom 6529 emojis - if you make any, let @[prxt0] to add. we have lots of new 'characters' and concepts from the cards that would make for good emojis
paging @[arsonic] - presumably sgt pepe world and pebbles have a lot to contribute here
🚨🚨we have emojis now. open call for more custom 6529 emojis - if you make any, let @[prxt0] to add. we have lots of new 'characters' and concepts from the cards that would make for good emojis
🚨🚨we have emojis now. open call for more custom 6529 emojis - if you make any, let @[prxt0] to add. we have lots of new 'characters' and concepts from the cards that would make for good emojis
this is exactly right. when i calculate inflation, i am taking the worst case scenario that everyone HODLs. obviously the reality is that inflation is even lower because people do sell and burn TDH.
i think the right way to think about it is how much relative "power" early vs later adopters should have. and as it is now, the early adopters have a lot of power, more than early BTC adopters so long as they don't sell. of course, if they sell they should have no power, just like you don't have the ability to do transactions in BTC if you sell your BTC
There I find interesting the aspect that when I hold the cards, every day a new TDH is added to the system, which seems like inflation, but when I receive a proportion of the TDH, so there is no real inflation in terms of the sum of my TDH, or not in terms of the ratio of my THD to the total THD in the system. The only real inflation from the perspective of the holder is the new cards released, which issue new additional TDH, which without buying more cards dilutes my ratio of owned TDH to the total amount of TDH in the system, this is the only real inflation from the perspective of the amount of owned TDH and the holder. But again, the burned TDH works in the opposite/deflationary direction.
which is even better
which embeds sensors and can take actions automatically based on sensor readings
now they also have the Atem X
depending on the room
so my initial setup was their monitors + the HealthPro 100/200
Do you use their monitors as well? Or just have enough filters to make sure you'll be covered regardless
summon a drone, etc
will become even more expressive with robotics
:)
"i have baked fresh cookies and left them in this storage locker" - free for anyone with TDH > X
in the physical world
it creates the ability to have enchanted objects
fully decentralized
no staff to give you code or key needed
no intermediaries needed