19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1122137 2026-06-22 14:35
so tl;dr this was my fault it deployed
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1122135 2026-06-22 14:35
you can't expect the deployment train to all all the conditionalities of every agent thread someone is working on
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1122132 2026-06-22 14:34
of course the FE and BE should go together but the person or AI responsible should be the person doing that feature
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1122131 2026-06-22 14:34
and in the meantime someone called me and by the time I got off the phone a deployment happened
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1122130 2026-06-22 14:33
and was going to come here and tell everyone to be careful
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1122129 2026-06-22 14:33
and then I merged it and deliberately did not deploy because I suspected you had the AUTH v2 FE ready but not the BE
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1122127 2026-06-22 14:33
I was semi-irritated at @[prxt0] forgetting that AIs exist so I had the AI autonomously fix all his failing Jest tests
punk6529 Dev Team Chat Reply #1122125 2026-06-22 14:32
none of this is the AI's fault
Context from GelatoGenesis #1121647 2026-06-22 12:17
For future. We need to tell our AI-minions that when there is a development which needs to be done in order (BE first for example) then it should not merge the FE until BE is already deployed.
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121629 2026-06-22 12:14
I merged and someone else must have deployed (maybe me, on another thread)
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121627 2026-06-22 12:14
i did not deploy!
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121620 2026-06-22 12:11
if you want roll back the deployment
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121618 2026-06-22 12:11
in any case, in good news, I resolved all of your 1,000+ Jest tests
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121615 2026-06-22 12:11
and not just merged?
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121614 2026-06-22 12:11
are you sure it is deployed
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121613 2026-06-22 12:10
ah, i told it not to deploy
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121061 2026-06-22 07:22
i will come back when I have more
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121060 2026-06-22 07:22
lets see how it does and if we can resolve today
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121058 2026-06-22 07:22
in any case @[prxt0] @[simo] i sent off a small swarm to deal with the Jest stuff
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121051 2026-06-22 07:15
Developer mode works with Browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. It gives Codex controlled access to the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP). Use it when you want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine page state such as the DOM and applied styles, or diagnose an issue directly in the live browser. To enable it, open Settings > Browser and, under Developer mode, turn on Enable full CDP access. If your organization has disabled this setting, you can’t enable it locally. Admins can set browser_use_full_cdp_access = false under [features] in requirements.toml. Full CDP access lets Codex inspect and control sensitive browser internals that may put your data at risk. Codex asks for explicit approval before it uses full CDP to inspect a website. Review the site, task, and requested access before you approve it. Use @Browser for the in-app browser. To use Developer mode in Chrome, set up the Codex Chrome extension and invoke @Chrome.
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121050 2026-06-22 07:15
https://developers.openai.com/codex/app/browser#developer-mode
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121049 2026-06-22 07:15
also related unrelated this is good
punk6529 Dev Team Chat Reply #1121048 2026-06-22 07:15
don't see it, not sure why, I feel I remember reading the tweet
Context from simo #1121031 2026-06-22 07:01
Ok, that would be awesome. Looking into it
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121013 2026-06-22 06:54
![Seize](https://d3lqz0a4bldqgf.cloudfront.net/drops/author_0f831714-87b4-11ee-9d82-029a0e4b6159/886ddbf2-06f6-47b4-bc22-199375b64d5b/image.png)
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121012 2026-06-22 06:53
just to give a flavor of what I am grinding (ofc they will have to be checked/tested/etc)
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121011 2026-06-22 06:51
we can use this: https://aws.amazon.com/device-farm/
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121010 2026-06-22 06:51
and then for broader testing across different device types
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121009 2026-06-22 06:51
we can do this for development team loop
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121008 2026-06-22 06:51
and there is something similar we can do with android
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1121006 2026-06-22 06:50
iirc there is an xcode plugin in codes
punk6529 Dev Team Chat Reply #1121005 2026-06-22 06:50
i think you can set this up to work natively on your computer/iphone
Context from simo #1120989 2026-06-22 06:33
Yes mobile app
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120988 2026-06-22 06:32
For mobile you mean?
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120980 2026-06-22 06:23
What do you mean about #2 real access to the app?
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120979 2026-06-22 06:23
Codex and bots are already superhuman
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120978 2026-06-22 06:23
On topics like "can we fix every little stupid thing"
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120976 2026-06-22 06:22
You see the team has not mentally yet grokked that nobody is manually going to fix 500 failing jest tests
punk6529 Dev Team Chat Reply #1120975 2026-06-22 06:22
To do all of this we need rigorous testing framework
Context from simo #1120970 2026-06-22 06:18
gm I was thinking a lot at weekend what I want to focus next. My list: 1. sentry and others logs. this is 100% task for codex to do at scale (but human review). Also let codex add different logs to figure out performance and random crashes 2. Figure out how to give codex access to real app - would be huge for performance improvements 3. I want to let codex run basically 24/7 on site randomly and find all kind of ux/ui responsiveness/performance etc issues Also will look into feedback channels. What punk did deploy at weekend etc, but overall strong focus from me this week is to bring development to scale and starting with errors/performance. Also, tomorrow and day after that is biggest holiday of the year in Estonia. I think I skip mostly it this year, working on stuff above but might be bit on/off now and then
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120965 2026-06-22 06:15
None of them are urgent
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120964 2026-06-22 06:15
If this means the PRs wait for a day, it is fine
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120961 2026-06-22 06:14
I am 100% certain if I don't force the issue this way it will not get resolved like it hasn't the last 4 years
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120960 2026-06-22 06:14
I have thought about the consequences just fine
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120958 2026-06-22 06:14
I am not thinking through the consequences
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120956 2026-06-22 06:13
But if I don't merge you ticket in the next 5 minutes
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120955 2026-06-22 06:13
For 1 week it was no problem to delay auth v2
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120952 2026-06-22 06:13
You see i think this is all a bit ironic
punk6529 Dev Team Chat Reply #1120951 2026-06-22 06:12
I prefer you don't merge anything and we fix this
Context from prxt0 #1120948 2026-06-22 06:09
and im only saying it so that we consider these things a bit more im not saying it in order to now go back and turn it off
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120940 2026-06-22 06:01
"i did not fail the test" because "i did not take it"
punk6529 Dev Team Chat Reply #1120939 2026-06-22 06:01
"turning off the step" is the same thing with nicer bedtime story to yourself?
Context from prxt0 #1120936 2026-06-22 06:01
yes minus the merging of a PR with a failed step
punk6529 Dev Team Chat #1120937 2026-06-22 06:01
it is going to be dealt with today