19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102490 2026-06-17 13:27
I was harassing @[simo] and @[GelatoGenesis] and @[prxt0] and @[ragne] that it was possible but I do not think they believed me until today
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102487 2026-06-17 13:26
yes and now; have expected for a while and it was clear by beginning of year that it was possible (my 'wow' moment) and I have spent the last few months spending time and money to figure out how to do it
Context from gpebbles #1102473 2026-06-17 13:25
are you yourself a lil blown away by it.. even if you saw this coming for some time?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102478 2026-06-17 13:25
quality of life improvement on displaying of our own NFTs in our waves
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102476 2026-06-17 13:25
https://6529.io/rememes/0xC4a27A38972A56Db6d719A4526D6E16Eb13CcC64/16
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102474 2026-06-17 13:25
https://6529.io/meme-lab/71
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102471 2026-06-17 13:25
https://6529.io/6529-gradient/0
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102470 2026-06-17 13:24
https://6529.io/nextgen/token/10000000986
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102469 2026-06-17 13:24
https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102467 2026-06-17 13:24
autonomously subject to my prompting
Context from gpebbles #1102462 2026-06-17 13:22
do not think we need scores for DMs.. but i know they are all waves as well so makes sense on v1.. and there is someting to not seeing the scores but it being understood with some visual thing and easily findable too
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102452 2026-06-17 13:20
page needs some graphic improvements but mansplainer here
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102450 2026-06-17 13:19
https://6529.io/discover/wave-score
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102443 2026-06-17 13:16
I think it is in a good direction
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102441 2026-06-17 13:16
It should be live now lets test and iterate
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102438 2026-06-17 13:16
so as you have seen, you asked for wave scoring, I have delivered wave scoring (you actually asked for rep, but the reality is wave scoring is a better approach to the problem because it takes into account multiple signals)
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101126 2026-06-17 05:58
https://6529.io/rememes/0xC4a27A38972A56Db6d719A4526D6E16Eb13CcC64/26
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101123 2026-06-17 05:58
https://6529.io/meme-lab/71
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101120 2026-06-17 05:57
https://6529.io/6529-gradient/0
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101116 2026-06-17 05:55
https://6529.io/nextgen/token/10000000221
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101114 2026-06-17 05:55
https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1100353 2026-06-16 20:41
https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1100351 2026-06-16 20:40
https://6529.io/about/tech
punk6529 Memes-Chat #1098367 2026-06-16 08:20
minor quality of life issue: github links of all types make cleaner cards and profile pages on 6529 do also
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098358 2026-06-16 08:13
@[GelatoGenesis] a bit of cleanup/hardening: pls merge/deploy unless you have an issue https://github.com/6529-Collections/6529seize-backend/pull/1636
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098268 2026-06-16 07:02
https://6529.io/rememes/0x5f0780d4548409741ba6628bd461f93786d27d3c/1
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098267 2026-06-16 07:02
https://6529.io/meme-lab/71
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098266 2026-06-16 07:01
https://6529.io/nextgen/token/10000000514
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098265 2026-06-16 07:01
https://6529.io/6529-gradient/92
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098264 2026-06-16 07:01
ignore https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1098085 2026-06-16 05:48
yup this is fine
Context from simo #1098079 2026-06-16 05:46
yes, i go over i18n, doing pretty quick review and merging - looking bots comments - looking into code that it dont touch auth or other things whats not related Once i have merged small PR's into bigger i18n PR, then doing one bigger review
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098078 2026-06-16 05:44
I will work on a plan with you and we will run the rest of the site too
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1098077 2026-06-16 05:44
if you are not going to touch auth/ipfs bc it is @[prxt0], I think you and @[ragne] getting up to speed on 18n and WCAG would be good and once we fix (if needed) and merge the outstanding ones
Context from simo #1098072 2026-06-16 05:40
gm, on it already
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098071 2026-06-16 05:39
there is no reason we can't do all of it
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098070 2026-06-16 05:39
so let's please follow this exact plan for today
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098068 2026-06-16 05:39
5/ to make a small point, I deployed the updated github and profile cards, I sent it to deploy, test, iterate, along the way it had to patch something on the 1a staging branch, but as you can see the cards are live and looking good
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1098067 2026-06-16 05:38
gm sunshines @[GelatoGenesis] @[prxt0] @[ragne] the priorities for you today are: 1/ review, test and if you agree ship the revised AUTH. It hardens first party approaches while leaving the community pathway open 2/ then same thing for the IPFS/Arweave centralized/common handling 3/ in an hour or two, I will also give you the wave scoring - i did it last night 4/ all the other tickets @[simo] are pretty straightforward. there is a lot of i18n and WCAG 2.2 AA ones. Obviously if I put it to merge, deploy, E2E test by itself, it would do just fine on those but I left them open so you and @[ragne] and @[prxt0] can see the approach. one small side question - I want by the end of the week the site to be accessible and localizable. It is a grindy task, but the llms are good at grinding, so we should let them lead and we supervise/monitor for errors
Context from simo #1098027 2026-06-16 05:14
gm keep grinding thru PR's. Focusing on getting speed up
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096202 2026-06-15 18:48
on this note btw, please note the vastly more chic github cards that work for all types of github objects
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096201 2026-06-15 18:47
and pushed, in fact, 555 PRs in repos where I just went ahead and merged
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096199 2026-06-15 18:47
the only reason we don't have 555 PRs is that I turned my attention elsewhere until I saw what would happen here
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096198 2026-06-15 18:47
there is no point to leave 60 PRs outstanding for 4 days for then the team to manually tell codex to automatically test them and then on day 5, we have 55 PRs outstanding
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096196 2026-06-15 18:46
for the easy and medium ones, I already more or less know they are fine, with a bit harder testing, we can just let them merge and deploy
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096195 2026-06-15 18:46
the right human use is to look at the more complicated ones where they may require judgement from outside the repo e.g. the issue with authentication
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1096192 2026-06-15 18:45
not totally sure the right human use is for you to tell codex to do automated testing. we can automate this part obviously, with a proper test suite
Context from simo #1095659 2026-06-15 16:51
Spend most of the day struggling in PR conflict and review hell. Got some good improvements at the end. Most PRs are 100% fine, but they are really easy ones also. What I do currently and what should/could be automated in future is, that I pull branch into local. Let codex make QA plan for code path he can test (desktop) and give list what he can’t test but are critical changes(mobile, usually none). Then let it use browser and run tests and report back. I run currently mobile tests manually if there are any. Also taking a human look to code. Lot can be done parallel but real desktop browser automation. There seems to be some bug in codex-app, you can’t run multiple browsers parallel. It does start refreshing them randomly. Going to look tomorrow can I overcome it. I would like to automate this part all, so that human gets 1. Tested in desktop browser and report of these findings (possibly also fixed and iterated) 2. List of cirical mobile tests what need to be done (I am sure most of these can also be automated) I have some good flow and keep going tomorrow. Let’s see what can I improve
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1095455 2026-06-15 15:56
i am pushing PRs these days, many many many PRs, so so so many PRs :)
Context from maybe #1095450 2026-06-15 15:55
Ser I apologize for being emo last night and yelling at you into the abyss. Id asked if you could opine a couple previous times and I don’t think you saw it. I respect your thought leadership and I think others do too. i think you’re a very clear thinker and I was looking to see if I was missing something
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1095436 2026-06-15 15:53
the networks job is to give the tooling
Context from punk6529 #1095431 2026-06-15 15:52
the people will decide
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1095432 2026-06-15 15:52
great post
Context from grubnot #1095429 2026-06-15 15:51
https://6529.io/waves/5f207393-5418-4a75-8738-e40edb44a94d?serialNo=1093267
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1095431 2026-06-15 15:52
the people will decide
Context from Anonwave #1095428 2026-06-15 15:51
Is it even a problem to be solved?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1095412 2026-06-15 15:44
seems solvable
Context from Anonwave #1095035 2026-06-15 14:01
Will crosspost from a very negatively repd wave
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1095409 2026-06-15 15:44
maybe someone should do it to see
Context from gpebbles #1095057 2026-06-15 14:04
maybe has not had any real heat what so ever
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1094800 2026-06-15 13:26
that is you, someone else may not
Context from Anonwave #1094795 2026-06-15 13:25
Will moderate on that. Those things won’t show up here when cross posting.