Oceans of Wisdom

what accounts communities etc they show you on sign up

effectively this is what social media sites do but centrally

wave rep may be an interesting solution

because then someoen coudl put their 'buy viagra pills" wave on an autobot and be at the top constantly

it is a different form of open window / hackable thing that should be fixed

if a wave goes to the top based on when was the last drop

yes i agree with this, but that is a separate issue than the wave

if this destroys the network, better to find out now so we can fix it

my last six days https://6529.io/about/tech/punk6529-prs-2026-06-08-2026-06-15

people who want to work on it can, those who don't, don't, people will inevitably decide what to do

what i am saying is that this does not require global consensus

i mean i am pretty sure the "experiment" and "consensus" are on like polar opposite sides of the spectrum. if you have consensus on something ("the earth is round") you don't have to do an experiment

by virtue of either people going to use it a lot and find it valuable or forget that it exists in 3 weeks

isn't this going to just self-resolve

why do they have to agree

sounds like the expected case

"people disagree on if the anonwave adds value"

i mean all these things sound fine, but why do I have to make a ruling?

i mean I am not sure what the issue is, I am not following it closely

I was not the person who did it

why is this my responsibility now?

lil' bot is real, has been drafted to start working

as promised, I have started deploying my agentic approach I have been working on the last 5 months in our context. will be at a few hundred PRs in the first week. For now, my main focus is getting this working, because the exponential acceleration is here!

nice one ;) https://x.com/i/status/2065140125638549935

I think 3 with a 'see all' is ok

and since this is the case, you need to be thinking as much as possible about scalable approaches

obviously it is much more AGENT work maybe 100x more agent work, but it is maybe 2x more human work which is what counts

the main point I am trying to make is "rewrite 1 of 150 toasts to be more human friendly" is about the same amount of work as "rewrite all 150 toasts to be more human friendly"

don't spend any time on it yet, I mean and I will make a PR/proposal for us to review

@[GelatoGenesis] work on the existing PRs and I will propose a PR with the new workflow

i don't know if you have noticed this 'dev-ing' in public we are doing here, but I think you may find this interesting https://6529.io/waves/49f0e595-ec7c-4235-8695-a527f61b69f4

so I just told it to rewrite them all

that could potentially be rewritten

but there are 100+ toast messages

ok no biggie, this is fixable

seems like we had two toast systems

instead I asked the bots to look at it

i had raised it a couple of times, but lost in the chats here, there everywhere

there is a toast on the museum wave that is a) ugly and b) hard to understand

@simo and all, this is a good example of how I think about this topic differently now with the agents

https://github.com/6529-Collections/6529seize-frontend/pull/2584

1. dev team chat (this one) 2. ideas and feedback for site/tech etc (open to all) 3. the once a day autoposted summary of the items pushed, 4. general commentary

in fact you could imagine all of the following being "subwaves"?

where someone sees something wants to share an idea, we can chat with them etc etc

and the other is a public chat in parallel

one is like this

so something like two areas - i dunno which one is wave/parent/sub

because we will inevitably then move our chat private again

but also we probably don't want a full free for all in our dev chat

and not somewhere else in brain