19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080362 2026-06-11 07:34
and they will fix them
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080359 2026-06-11 07:33
the bots are perfectly capable of running E2E tests on staging
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080358 2026-06-11 07:33
staging is going to perform differently than the local dev environment
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080357 2026-06-11 07:33
I think the gating factor should be deploy to production
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080353 2026-06-11 07:32
right now the team logic at human scale is that the gating factor is "merge the code"
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080348 2026-06-11 07:32
we are going to have lots of conflicts in a few days
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080346 2026-06-11 07:32
does not know what branch to work on
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080345 2026-06-11 07:32
otherwise we have a situation where anyone starting a ticket now
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080343 2026-06-11 07:32
and then the human part should be checking the deployments before taking to production
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080339 2026-06-11 07:31
we should let the bots go all the way to deploying and doing their own testing on staging
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1080338 2026-06-11 07:31
i am almost certain this is not the answer
Context from simo #1080336 2026-06-11 07:31
random idea for starting, ai loop what can order them logically? ones what are not affecting each other and can be done parallel + then ordering confliced ones in good order
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080337 2026-06-11 07:31
bc valued Human Team Members (tm) have to sleep, eat, etc
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080335 2026-06-11 07:31
there is no reason to stop them working and iterating
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080333 2026-06-11 07:30
they can do that on staging
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080332 2026-06-11 07:30
the bots are pretty capable at E2E testing
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080331 2026-06-11 07:30
but they go through, merge, deploy on staging, and we hold them there
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080330 2026-06-11 07:30
which that holding point should not be at "raised a PR"
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080329 2026-06-11 07:30
but my guess is that the stable case is to actually use staging for what it is meant for
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080327 2026-06-11 07:30
we can discuss at the end of the day
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080326 2026-06-11 07:29
and it is going to cause conflicts down the line
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080325 2026-06-11 07:29
we are going to have lots of parallel branches stuck in review
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080324 2026-06-11 07:29
which they are going to get jammed on review
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080323 2026-06-11 07:29
but I think I know the outcome what is going to happen
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080322 2026-06-11 07:29
I am going to give you all a couple of days
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080306 2026-06-11 07:25
it is an interesting quesiton
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080305 2026-06-11 07:25
I guess that is something like a detailed full daily summary of what happened
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080302 2026-06-11 07:24
and then we would make something else that is a wave
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080301 2026-06-11 07:24
but we can think about it
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080300 2026-06-11 07:24
i dunno if it shoudl be everyone
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080299 2026-06-11 07:24
ofc in that case we might want to loosen up the posting rules
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080298 2026-06-11 07:24
we have the automations but we also discussion our BOD, EOD anything that is not a sensitive topic can move here
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080297 2026-06-11 07:23
so anything we would previously do in our dev way, can just move to here
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080291 2026-06-11 07:22
we cover new PRs, merges and we move our dev chat here effectively
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080288 2026-06-11 07:21
ok so I think this can be then "everything"
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080282 2026-06-11 07:19
that is somewhere else
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080280 2026-06-11 07:19
maybe a detailed daily summary
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080279 2026-06-11 07:19
and then we need something else I think that is more summary
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080278 2026-06-11 07:19
which is interesting in a different way
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1080277 2026-06-11 07:19
unless if we are basically making this our coordination area for dev-ing and we are just dev-ing in public
Context from punk6529 #1080270 2026-06-11 07:07
is there any need to show twice?
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1080270 2026-06-11 07:07
is there any need to show twice?
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1080269 2026-06-11 07:06
do we need to show on both? I was thinking just to show on merge
Context from GelatoGenesis #1076871 2026-06-10 14:24
@[punk6529] just to be clear. you want to summarise at the time of merge not at the time of creating the pull request, right? I think this makes sense because only at the time of merge we'll have the full context. This would mean that we'll leave the not so human friendly current PR trigger messages and we would add a new hook when PR actually would be merged to main which would have nice summary, what got merged.
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1076701 2026-06-10 13:51
and we have to speak to them in "their" language
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1076700 2026-06-10 13:50
because there are like 100 people here and 8 billion people not here
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1076698 2026-06-10 13:50
but making it useble, legible, comprehensible both to the people who are here but even more importantly, all the people who are not here!
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1076695 2026-06-10 13:50
and the work is not just "shipping it to main and deploying"
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1076692 2026-06-10 13:49
that will allow us with a small team to do the work that previously would have required a much larger team