that people should conform to your preferences
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
yes, yes, this is the moral position
"I do not approve of other people's preferences"
so sad
"why don't people spend money on the things that I want"
and I am used to it, but it is not particularly helpful to the person who makes it their worldview
but here in NFT space, it is considered normal to come to people and say "the thing you bought is shit, it is going to go to zero and if it does not it is manipulation and you are a bad person for not buying my stuff"
its odd because IRL I have never experienced this. i don't have people I barely know tell me that I should not have bought NIKE shoes or this car or another
my friend one amusing thing you will learn in this space is that a decent % of the people in this space have strong opinions about what you should do with your own money
suddenly showed up to tell me we should have spent the money on the other artists
not spending money, pressing the "free" retweet button
all the emerging artists supports who never bothered retweeting the emerging artists i posted
the second I posted the Goose
nobody engaged
everyone says we should collect from emerging artists; i posted an emerging artists 3x a week for years
it is not just important than you collect from emerging artists (as if it is any right for them to tell you how to spend your money), it is also somehow important to tell you what not to collect
for some people
however it is never enough
we can agree to disagree on that, but as I have pointed out before, both directly in the museum and indirectly via the memes, I am pretty sure nobody has funneled more capital to "unknown" or "emerging" artists than me
New collectors (from 2030) won't care about lost robbies, about pepe. It's not only about art, scarcity, value, FP etc. We were building something bigger here
set a great example for everyone
and demonstrate how it can be done
why don't you @[Sert] specifically do something
we have the meme cards and we have an open call for new photography that right now nobody is pushing to "create something more"
So let's try to create something scalable here instead of buying always the old good things
what % of people can name more than 20 pieces in the Louvre without looking them up
they are power law distributed
and cultural objects
this is the nature of art
so what?
most of them for sure. out of 500 collections, maybe 20 make it
Probably artblocks too
LRs aren't but anyway anyone is welcome to their own opinions
most are going to zero
this is true!
and explain to the audience what dunces they are for buying NFTs in the first place
anyway @[Sert] why don't you propose you make a website and right click save as the NFTs you like
but obviously I am literally the last person on planet earth that would believe that
this is 100% true
ok, great
so @[Sert] is now arguing that he can right click save as the NFTs
why not just put the JPGs on a website for us to look at?
why did you do that?
didn't you recently mint a collection?
you could. same is true for your NFTs and the meme cards and BTC itself. you don't need to own a BTC to look at a block explorer
So I can build a museum on a website, linking the different artworks. I don't have to own them
this is all fine
and i might think @[Sert] has good opinions about art or trump or the solar system
i know that, but this is my red line. people can tell me I am stupid and doing things wrong and this may well be the case
I don't think 99.9% look at it that way no matter what someone says if they do they wouldn't be here.
so two sentences that are obviously true. you can see xcopy online. and one, once again, accusation of unethicalness
and even more delusional, is the idea that we can move the price of a lost robbie if we say we would like one
the purpose of our museum is not "price and value manipulation"
of course, huge error
but so can I