19,158 matching drops
#1459158 2026-09-22 15:17
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853545 2026-04-02 22:49
and that every social media site has a timeline
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853543 2026-04-02 22:49
there was a reason we had a timeline
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #853542 2026-04-02 22:49
we need something; we have a real issue with discoverability and with tracking waves
Context from simo #853519 2026-04-02 22:31
We need some permanent pinned wave, what’s pinned for everyone
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853541 2026-04-02 22:48
dominant position by @[HugoFaz] ![Seize](https://d3lqz0a4bldqgf.cloudfront.net/drops/author_0f831714-87b4-11ee-9d82-029a0e4b6159/43d909fd-c1ae-409b-a1b9-7ae0a2c62d27.png)
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853518 2026-04-02 22:30
and dropping in other waves etc
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #853517 2026-04-02 22:30
yes....
Context from RegularDad #853516 2026-04-02 22:29
This is the kind of think people should be boosting so that it doesn’t get missed again
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853514 2026-04-02 22:28
🚨🚨6529 NETWORK MUSEUM SIGNER NOMINATIONS AND VOTES 🚨🚨 https://6529.io/waves/a2ed7791-6402-4333-9780-d7af1fdce918
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #853509 2026-04-02 22:26
ok will handle
Context from simo #853507 2026-04-02 22:26
I did post it once but it was off hours or maybe chat
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853505 2026-04-02 22:25
bc there are no nominations yet
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #853504 2026-04-02 22:25
have we told anyone?
Context from simo #853501 2026-04-02 22:25
Yes
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853499 2026-04-02 22:24
@[simo] the signer wave, is it live?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #853497 2026-04-02 22:24
ok pls implement when you can
Context from simo #853495 2026-04-02 22:24
Agree
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853496 2026-04-02 22:24
cc @[prxt0] @[GelatoGenesis] @[ragne] @[6529er]
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853494 2026-04-02 22:23
i think this is a good idea to test
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853492 2026-04-02 22:23
we can allow read without logging in
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #853490 2026-04-02 22:23
so if anyone can see the group
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #853489 2026-04-02 22:22
we could try read only on public groups @[simo]
Context from arsonic #853465 2026-04-02 22:09
also ![Seize](https://d3lqz0a4bldqgf.cloudfront.net/drops/author_0f82dd26-87b4-11ee-9d82-029a0e4b6159/3aec498f-9bda-404b-a7f8-290aa1fe681d.png)
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #841678 2026-03-31 06:01
@[simo] @[prxt0] @[GelatoGenesis] please confirm status
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #841672 2026-03-31 06:00
https://x.com/i/status/2038842907466334550
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #840442 2026-03-30 22:49
i think we can do a time lock in SAFE
Context from gpebbles #840440 2026-03-30 22:49
@[punk6529] would there be an intermediary not as complicated as time lock for entire affialite collection step.. of just allowing me to time lock memes and gradients?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840441 2026-03-30 22:49
and then TBD to the network museum
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840439 2026-03-30 22:48
you could do internal to the other card holders to start
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840434 2026-03-30 22:48
they are not likely selling to an unrelated party
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840433 2026-03-30 22:48
that if someone is selling way under market
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840430 2026-03-30 22:47
there is no way to know who is a related party onchain anyway
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840428 2026-03-30 22:47
solves majority doing stupid deals
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #840427 2026-03-30 22:47
no dude, just ROFR in general
Context from 6529Guardian #840424 2026-03-30 22:47
ROFR for related parties?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840423 2026-03-30 22:47
classic minority protection
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840421 2026-03-30 22:46
i don't know why were we so dumb
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #840420 2026-03-30 22:46
no obviously not for that - for related party sales in the other ones (the ones people affiliate with the NFTs they own and sell stakes)
Context from 6529Guardian #840410 2026-03-30 22:45
@[punk6529] which problem do you think the ROFR solves? Or did you mean the not for profit entity - i would not have thought the latter bc we were already assuming no expectation of profit and not necessarily an entity
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #840395 2026-03-30 22:44
gul
Context from maybe #840394 2026-03-30 22:44
GUL
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #840358 2026-03-30 22:38
the affiliateed stuff needs work