for security it is a honeypot
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,158
matching drops
#1459158
2026-09-22 15:17
we could in principle have some network owned infrastructure for redundancy not for security
was even thinking of having a physical time lock which seems quite silly
but this is a material improvement to current state of the art
nothing is 100% perfect ok
you just need the time lock to be materially longer than any possible plausible kidnapping lol
correct!
you do not want someone to be able to steal your colelction
agree with all the @[gpebbles] timelock comments
and there you want 2 days in a different safe
maybe you want to keep some ETH handy
like maybe on JPGs it is 6 months
and people can set timelock to their desired length
the idea is basically:
1/ time lock
2/ plus legible "we all use the same signer alt to timelock that people may learn won't sign"
3/ plus emergency exit from timelock in case of "bug in safe" "blockchain migration etc"
because otherwise what is to prevent the attacker from not even hitting me on the head but just stealing my laptop and coming here and saying "hey bros, help me amount i put a tx in, can you please sign it, need to do this mint"
only blockchain/network level topics
they have to agree to basically not sign individual requests
all of these are less credible "baseball bat resistent" than 5,000 people around the world who have socially agreed to not sign
because someone is logically going to think that any other address is your family, friends, colleagues or at worse banker/lawyer/etc
no individual address can make as powerful a committment
only network issues like quantum etc
network can make credible committments that they don't respond to individual situations
the moron hitting you with the hammer might think the network will come to your rescue and send his cronies summer.jpg
it is why you need to make the network museum a stakeholder
to save the museum's affiliated collections
well that is the type of thing i could see the gang getting together and authorizing a series of txt to migrate everyone's safes
and you are going to miss the window and now vitalik will steal your jpgs (he's been playing long game saving money not buying them to steal them later)
and you have timelocked yourself to 6 months
let's say there was in fact a quantum threat
what do i mean
but not impossible
there is an address that is very hard to get to vote
and in fact it is a feature of our network
bc if 10,000 people use it
otherwise I think it is quite good
this is why i have not yet pushed
the hard issue with my idea is for the nerds not to decide it is a collective investment scheme that each of you are running
yes sure this is the easiest of issues
sir in your above museum network idea though that i think is super duper interesting but you are going to need to change consolidations.. lol.. we need the groups to have more addresses!
bc if 10,000 people use it
could potentially be credible
whereas "wewontsign.6529.eth" as the main signer
the thing that holds me back is things like "vitalik changes the blockchain and you need to move your stuff" and it does not make it to the quantum resistant blockchain etc
in what situation would you ever want to sell it? if none then just destroy it all
it has unironically crossed my mind
buy and burn. Locked forever
or in the backyard
"sure, you probably just have this under the couch"
may think
bc the attacker may thing
the beatings to my head with a baseball bat may continue
bc if it is any other address
wereallyarentgoingtounlock.6529.eth
and it needs to be literally like
so you can say "brosef, it is not going to happen"
#1 has to be I think close to impossible
imagine that to unlock the safe you need one of two conditions:
1/ 50% of TDH (or whatever crazy thing) to vote
or
2/ whatever your normal family signers are with a timelock you determine